Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Qualcomm Adreno 680

Qualcomm Adreno 680 Qualcomm Adreno 685 Qualcomm Adreno 690 Qualcomm Adreno 830
VS
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe G1 UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Qualcomm Adreno 680 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Qualcomm Adreno 680
2018
7 Watt
2.17

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms Qualcomm Adreno 680 by a whopping 243% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Qualcomm Adreno 680 Adreno 680
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking876542
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.9318.83
Architectureno dataGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameno dataTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 December 2018 (6 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data80
Core clock speedno data400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 MHz
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt28 Watt

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212_1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Qualcomm Adreno 680 2.17
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 7.45
+243%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Qualcomm Adreno 680 1936
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 5332
+175%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD5−6
−280%
19
+280%
1440p2−3
−350%
9
+350%
4K4−5
−250%
14
+250%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−933%
31
+933%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−250%
14
+250%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−133%
14
+133%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−333%
26
+333%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−700%
24
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−200%
12
+200%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−400%
20
+400%
Fortnite 10−11
−340%
40−45
+340%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−191%
30−35
+191%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−950%
21
+950%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−117%
12−14
+117%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−136%
24−27
+136%
Valorant 40−45
−92.5%
75−80
+92.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−283%
23
+283%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−300%
12
+300%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
−176%
110−120
+176%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−150%
10
+150%
Dota 2 21−24
−69.6%
39
+69.6%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−375%
19
+375%
Fortnite 10−11
−340%
40−45
+340%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−191%
30−35
+191%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−900%
20
+900%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
−180%
14
+180%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−117%
12−14
+117%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−200%
12
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−136%
24−27
+136%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−175%
22
+175%
Valorant 40−45
−92.5%
75−80
+92.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−283%
23
+283%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−125%
9
+125%
Dota 2 21−24
−56.5%
36
+56.5%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−350%
18
+350%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−191%
30−35
+191%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−117%
12−14
+117%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−136%
24−27
+136%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−37.5%
11
+37.5%
Valorant 40−45
−92.5%
75−80
+92.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
−340%
40−45
+340%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 6
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−160%
35−40
+160%
Valorant 16−18
−382%
80−85
+382%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6
+500%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−100%
12
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−240%
16−18
+240%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−150%
10
+150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−275%
14−16
+275%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Valorant 10−11
−270%
35−40
+270%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 2−3
Dota 2 5−6
−220%
16
+220%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 10−12
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%

1440p
High Preset

Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how Qualcomm Adreno 680 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compete in popular games:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 280% faster in 1080p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 350% faster in 1440p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 250% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 950% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is ahead in 54 tests (89%)
  • there's a draw in 7 tests (11%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.17 7.45
Recency 6 December 2018 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 28 Watt

Qualcomm Adreno 680 has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, on the other hand, has a 243.3% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm Adreno 680 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Qualcomm Adreno 680
Adreno 680
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Qualcomm Adreno 680 Adreno 680
vs
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
vs
GTX 860M GeForce GTX 860M
Qualcomm Adreno 680 Adreno 680
vs
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
vs
RTX 4090 RTX 4090
Graphics 512SP Radeon Graphics 512SP
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile RTX 3050 Mobile
HD Graphics 530 HD Graphics 530
vs
GTX 1650 GDDR6 GTX 1650 GDDR6
ATI HD 4670 AGP Radeon HD 4670 AGP
vs
RTX 3070 SUPER RTX 3070 SUPER
UHD Graphics 770 UHD Graphics 770
vs
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
vs
P5200 Max-Q P5200 Max-Q
HD 7950 Radeon HD 7950
vs
HD 8970M HD 8970M
GT 1030 GeForce GT 1030
vs
ATI X1050 Radeon X1050
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
vs
GTX 960 OEM GTX 960 OEM
K5100M Quadro K5100M
vs
Iris Xe MAX Graphics Xe MAX Graphics

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.4 38 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 969 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Qualcomm Adreno 680 or Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.