Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Qualcomm Adreno 680

Place in performance ranking	762	492
Place by popularity	not in top-100	59
Architecture	no data	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	no data	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	6 December 2018 (5 years ago)	15 August 2020 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	80
Core clock speed	no data	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1350 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	7 Watt	28 Watt

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

12_1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Qualcomm Adreno 680 2.74

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 7.61
+178%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms Qualcomm Adreno 680 by 178% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Qualcomm Adreno 680 1936

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 5332
+175%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms Qualcomm Adreno 680 by 175% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	6−7 −217%	19 +217%
1440p	3−4 −233%	10 +233%
4K	5−6 −180%	14 +180%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6

−180%

14
+180%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −275%	14−16 +275%
Battlefield 5	6−7 −333%	26 +333%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −75%	21−24 +75%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −160%	13 +160%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −400%	20 +400%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −800%	27 +800%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −271%	24−27 +271%
Hitman 3	5−6 −460%	28 +460%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −275%	15 +275%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −283%	23 +283%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −88.9%	17 +88.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −1500%	16 +1500%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −275%	14−16 +275%
Battlefield 5	6−7 −283%	23 +283%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −75%	21−24 +75%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −100%	10 +100%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −375%	19 +375%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −733%	25 +733%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −271%	24−27 +271%
Hitman 3	5−6 −340%	22 +340%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −75%	7 +75%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −200%	12 +200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +0%	6 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −100%	18 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −267%	22 +267%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −1300%	14 +1300%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −275%	14−16 +275%
Battlefield 5	6−7 −283%	23 +283%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −60%	8 +60%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −350%	18 +350%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −633%	22 +633%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −271%	24−27 +271%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −83.3%	11 +83.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −120%	10−12 +120%
Hitman 3	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 −44.4%	12−14 +44.4%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −83.3%	10−12 +83.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	6−7
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −200%	12 +200%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −400%	10 +400%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Hitman 3	3−4 −133%	7−8 +133%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%