UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) vs Qualcomm Adreno 680

Place in the ranking	860	856
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	21.88	15.66
Architecture	no data	Gen. 11 (2021)
GPU code name	no data	Gen. 11
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	6 December 2018 (6 years ago)	11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	24
Core clock speed	no data	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	800 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	7 Watt	4.8 - 10 Watt

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

12_1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Qualcomm Adreno 680 2.22

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) 2.27
+2.3%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Qualcomm Adreno 680 1936
+32.8%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) 1458

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

10−12

−20%

12
+20%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Elden Ring	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −9.1%	12−14 +9.1%
Metro Exodus	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Dota 2	5−6 −20%	6 +20%
Elden Ring	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +16.7%	12 −16.7%
Fortnite	10−12 −9.1%	12−14 +9.1%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −9.1%	12−14 +9.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Metro Exodus	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 −4.8%	21−24 +4.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
World of Tanks	40−45 −2.4%	40−45 +2.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Dota 2	5−6 −220%	16 +220%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −9.1%	12−14 +9.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 −4.8%	21−24 +4.8%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
World of Tanks	14−16 −7.1%	14−16 +7.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Valorant	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Elden Ring	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Fortnite	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Valorant	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

This is how Qualcomm Adreno 680 and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is 20% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Qualcomm Adreno 680 is 17% faster.
in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is 220% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Qualcomm Adreno 680 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is ahead in 12 tests (23%)
there's a draw in 39 tests (75%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.22	2.27
Recency	6 December 2018	11 January 2021
Chip lithography	7 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	7 Watt	4 Watt

Qualcomm Adreno 680 has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU), on the other hand, has a 2.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 75% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Qualcomm Adreno 680 and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU).

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.