TITAN RTX vs Quadro P5000

Place in the ranking	172	70
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	7.25	2.12
Power efficiency	12.52	12.02
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GP104	TU102
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	1 October 2016 (8 years ago)	18 December 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,499	$2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Quadro P5000 has 242% better value for money than TITAN RTX.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	4608
Core clock speed	1607 MHz	1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	1733 MHz	1770 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	280 Watt
Texture fill rate	277.3	509.8
Floating-point processing power	8.873 TFLOPS	16.31 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	96
TMUs	160	288
Tensor Cores	no data	576
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1127 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192 GB/s	672.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	-	+
Display Port	1.4	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	-
3D Stereo	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	6.1	7.5
DLSS	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P5000 32.86

TITAN RTX 49.06
+49.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P5000 12631

TITAN RTX 18858
+49.3%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro P5000 52901

TITAN RTX 148699
+181%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Quadro P5000 56331

TITAN RTX 126701
+125%

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Quadro P5000 45153

TITAN RTX 166517
+269%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	93 −76.3%	164 +76.3%
1440p	65−70 −58.5%	103 +58.5%
4K	41 −80.5%	74 +80.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	26.87 −76.3%	15.24 +76.3%
1440p	38.45 −58.5%	24.26 +58.5%
4K	60.95 −80.5%	33.77 +80.5%

TITAN RTX has 76% lower cost per frame in 1080p
TITAN RTX has 58% lower cost per frame in 1440p
TITAN RTX has 80% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart	85−90 −200%	264 +200%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 −155%	166 +155%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 −14.5%	79 +14.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart	85−90 −125%	198 +125%
Battlefield 5	110−120 −44.2%	163 +44.2%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 −117%	141 +117%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 −14.5%	79 +14.5%
Far Cry 5	95−100 −66.7%	165 +66.7%
Fortnite	140−150 −20.7%	169 +20.7%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −55.8%	187 +55.8%
Forza Horizon 5	85−90 −88.8%	168 +88.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 −65.6%	202 +65.6%
Valorant	190−200 −80.3%	348 +80.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart	85−90 −34.1%	118 +34.1%
Battlefield 5	110−120 −45.1%	164 +45.1%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 −84.6%	120 +84.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	270−280 −1.1%	270−280 +1.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 −14.5%	79 +14.5%
Dota 2	130−140 −14.8%	155 +14.8%
Far Cry 5	95−100 −57.6%	156 +57.6%
Fortnite	140−150 −25.7%	176 +25.7%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −55%	186 +55%
Forza Horizon 5	85−90 −71.9%	153 +71.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	100−110 −42.1%	152 +42.1%
Metro Exodus	70−75 −91.4%	134 +91.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 −33.6%	163 +33.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	98 −172%	267 +172%
Valorant	190−200 −74.1%	336 +74.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 −41.6%	160 +41.6%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 −69.2%	110 +69.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 −13%	78 +13%
Dota 2	130−140 −9.6%	148 +9.6%
Far Cry 5	95−100 −47.5%	146 +47.5%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −45.8%	175 +45.8%
Forza Horizon 5	85−90 −46.1%	130−140 +46.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 −11.5%	136 +11.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	53 −162%	139 +162%
Valorant	190−200 −22.3%	236 +22.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite

140−150
+4.5%

134

−4.5%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −34.6%	35−40 +34.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	210−220 −48.1%	300−350 +48.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	55−60 −93.2%	114 +93.2%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −97.7%	85 +97.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Valorant	230−240 −33.5%	307 +33.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 −36.6%	110−120 +36.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −100%	66 +100%
Far Cry 5	70−75 −86.1%	134 +86.1%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −89.2%	157 +89.2%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 −48.1%	80−85 +48.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −68.5%	90−95 +68.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

75−80

−59.7%

120−130
+59.7%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart	24−27 −58.3%	35−40 +58.3%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −53.3%	21−24 +53.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	60−65 −120%	134 +120%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −104%	55 +104%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	36 −186%	103 +186%
Valorant	180−190 −63%	300 +63%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −102%	97 +102%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −20%	18 +20%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −120%	33 +120%
Dota 2	90−95 −55.3%	146 +55.3%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −111%	80 +111%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −107%	114 +107%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35 −45.2%	45−50 +45.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −167%	96 +167%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

35−40

−106%

74
+106%

This is how Quadro P5000 and TITAN RTX compete in popular games:

TITAN RTX is 76% faster in 1080p
TITAN RTX is 58% faster in 1440p
TITAN RTX is 80% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the Epic Preset, the Quadro P5000 is 4% faster.
in Atomic Heart, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the TITAN RTX is 200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Quadro P5000 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
TITAN RTX is ahead in 62 tests (97%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	32.86	49.06
Recency	1 October 2016	18 December 2018
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	280 Watt

Quadro P5000 has 180% lower power consumption.

TITAN RTX, on the other hand, has a 49.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

The TITAN RTX is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P5000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P5000 is a workstation graphics card while TITAN RTX is a desktop one.