TITAN RTX vs Quadro P5000

Place in the ranking	206	91
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.77	6.57
Power efficiency	12.96	12.36
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GP104	TU102
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	1 October 2016 (9 years ago)	18 December 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,499	$2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

TITAN RTX has 137% better value for money than Quadro P5000.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	4608
Core clock speed	1607 MHz	1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	1733 MHz	1770 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	280 Watt
Texture fill rate	277.3	509.8
Floating-point processing power	8.873 TFLOPS	16.31 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	96
TMUs	160	288
Tensor Cores	no data	576
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	72
L1 Cache	960 KB	4.5 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1127 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192 GB/s	672.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	-	+
Display Port	1.4	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	-
3D Stereo	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	6.1	7.5
DLSS	-	+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P5000 30.39

TITAN RTX 45.07
+48.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P5000 12715
Samples: 1028

TITAN RTX 18858
+48.3%

Samples: 251

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro P5000 52570

TITAN RTX 146711
+179%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Quadro P5000 54596

TITAN RTX 132278
+142%

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Quadro P5000 45153

TITAN RTX 166517
+269%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	93 −73.1%	161 +73.1%
1440p	65−70 −56.9%	102 +56.9%
4K	41 −78%	73 +78%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	26.87 −73.1%	15.52 +73.1%
1440p	38.45 −56.9%	24.50 +56.9%
4K	60.95 −78%	34.23 +78%

TITAN RTX has 73% lower cost per frame in 1080p
TITAN RTX has 57% lower cost per frame in 1440p
TITAN RTX has 78% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	170−180 −103%	353 +103%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 −14.5%	79 +14.5%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	110−120 −43%	163 +43%
Counter-Strike 2	170−180 −96.6%	342 +96.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 −14.5%	79 +14.5%
Escape from Tarkov	110−120 −9%	121 +9%
Far Cry 5	100−105 −65%	165 +65%
Fortnite	140−150 −19.9%	169 +19.9%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −55.8%	187 +55.8%
Forza Horizon 5	95−100 −71.4%	168 +71.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 −62.9%	202 +62.9%
Valorant	190−200 −79.4%	348 +79.4%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	110−120 −43.9%	164 +43.9%
Counter-Strike 2	170−180 −55.2%	270 +55.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	270−280 −1.1%	270−280 +1.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 −14.5%	79 +14.5%
Dota 2	130−140 −14.8%	155 +14.8%
Escape from Tarkov	110−120 −8.1%	120 +8.1%
Far Cry 5	100−105 −56%	156 +56%
Fortnite	140−150 −24.8%	176 +24.8%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −55%	186 +55%
Forza Horizon 5	95−100 −56.1%	153 +56.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	100−110 −40.7%	152 +40.7%
Metro Exodus	70−75 −88.7%	134 +88.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 −31.5%	163 +31.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	98 −172%	267 +172%
Valorant	190−200 −73.2%	336 +73.2%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	110−120 −40.4%	160 +40.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 −13%	78 +13%
Dota 2	130−140 −9.6%	148 +9.6%
Escape from Tarkov	110−120 −7.2%	119 +7.2%
Far Cry 5	100−105 −46%	146 +46%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −45.8%	175 +45.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 −9.7%	136 +9.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	53 −162%	139 +162%
Valorant	190−200 −21.6%	236 +21.6%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite

140−150
+5.2%

134

−5.2%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	70−75 −118%	157 +118%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	210−220 −49.1%	300−350 +49.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	60−65 −86.9%	114 +86.9%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −97.7%	85 +97.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Valorant	230−240 −33.5%	307 +33.5%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	80−85 −36.1%	110−120 +36.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −100%	66 +100%
Escape from Tarkov	70−75 −60.3%	117 +60.3%
Far Cry 5	70−75 −83.6%	134 +83.6%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −89.2%	157 +89.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −73.6%	90−95 +73.6%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite

75−80

−59%

120−130
+59%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −36.4%	45 +36.4%
Grand Theft Auto V	60−65 −116%	134 +116%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −104%	55 +104%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	36 −186%	103 +186%
Valorant	180−190 −61.3%	300 +61.3%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	45−50 −102%	97 +102%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −66.7%	55−60 +66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −120%	33 +120%
Dota 2	95−100 −53.7%	146 +53.7%
Escape from Tarkov	35−40 −134%	82 +134%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −111%	80 +111%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −107%	114 +107%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −167%	96 +167%

4K
Epic

Fortnite

35−40

−100%

74
+100%

This is how Quadro P5000 and TITAN RTX compete in popular games:

TITAN RTX is 73% faster in 1080p
TITAN RTX is 57% faster in 1440p
TITAN RTX is 78% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the Epic Preset, the Quadro P5000 is 5% faster.
in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the TITAN RTX is 186% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Quadro P5000 performs better in 1 test (2%)
TITAN RTX performs better in 62 tests (97%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	30.39	45.07
Recency	1 October 2016	18 December 2018
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	280 Watt

Quadro P5000 has 180% lower power consumption.

TITAN RTX, on the other hand, has a 48.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

The TITAN RTX is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P5000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P5000 is a workstation graphics card while TITAN RTX is a desktop one.