Quadro P2200 vs TITAN RTX

#ad 
Buy TITAN RTX
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN RTX with Quadro P2200, including specs and performance data.

TITAN RTX
2018
24 GB GDDR6, 280 Watt
45.42
+102%

TITAN RTX outperforms P2200 by a whopping 102% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking73249
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.12no data
Power efficiency11.8922.02
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameTU102GP106
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date18 December 2018 (6 years ago)10 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46081280
Core clock speed1350 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz1493 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate509.8119.4
Floating-point processing power16.31 TFLOPS3.822 TFLOPS
ROPs9640
TMUs28880
Tensor Cores576no data
Ray Tracing Cores72no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm201 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount24 GB5 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1251 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s200.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C4x DisplayPort
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.56.1
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

TITAN RTX 45.42
+102%
Quadro P2200 22.54

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN RTX 18858
+102%
Quadro P2200 9356

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

TITAN RTX 148687
+359%
Quadro P2200 32366

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

TITAN RTX 129684
+315%
Quadro P2200 31216

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

TITAN RTX 166517
+455%
Quadro P2200 29989

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD161
+115%
75−80
−115%
1440p102
+104%
50−55
−104%
4K73
+109%
35−40
−109%

Cost per frame, $

1080p15.52no data
1440p24.50no data
4K34.23no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 353
+108%
170−180
−108%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+126%
35−40
−126%
Hogwarts Legacy 167
+109%
80−85
−109%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 163
+104%
80−85
−104%
Counter-Strike 2 342
+114%
160−170
−114%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+126%
35−40
−126%
Far Cry 5 165
+106%
80−85
−106%
Fortnite 169
+111%
80−85
−111%
Forza Horizon 4 187
+108%
90−95
−108%
Forza Horizon 5 168
+110%
80−85
−110%
Hogwarts Legacy 145
+107%
70−75
−107%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 202
+102%
100−105
−102%
Valorant 348
+105%
170−180
−105%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 164
+105%
80−85
−105%
Counter-Strike 2 270
+108%
130−140
−108%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+114%
130−140
−114%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+126%
35−40
−126%
Dota 2 155
+107%
75−80
−107%
Far Cry 5 156
+108%
75−80
−108%
Fortnite 176
+107%
85−90
−107%
Forza Horizon 4 186
+107%
90−95
−107%
Forza Horizon 5 153
+104%
75−80
−104%
Grand Theft Auto V 152
+103%
75−80
−103%
Hogwarts Legacy 117
+113%
55−60
−113%
Metro Exodus 134
+106%
65−70
−106%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 163
+104%
80−85
−104%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 267
+105%
130−140
−105%
Valorant 336
+110%
160−170
−110%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 160
+113%
75−80
−113%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+123%
35−40
−123%
Dota 2 148
+111%
70−75
−111%
Far Cry 5 146
+109%
70−75
−109%
Forza Horizon 4 175
+106%
85−90
−106%
Hogwarts Legacy 94
+109%
45−50
−109%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 136
+109%
65−70
−109%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 139
+114%
65−70
−114%
Valorant 236
+115%
110−120
−115%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 134
+106%
65−70
−106%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 157
+109%
75−80
−109%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
+111%
150−160
−111%
Grand Theft Auto V 114
+107%
55−60
−107%
Metro Exodus 85
+113%
40−45
−113%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+106%
85−90
−106%
Valorant 307
+105%
150−160
−105%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+104%
55−60
−104%
Cyberpunk 2077 66
+120%
30−33
−120%
Far Cry 5 134
+106%
65−70
−106%
Forza Horizon 4 157
+109%
75−80
−109%
Hogwarts Legacy 69
+130%
30−33
−130%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
+109%
45−50
−109%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 120−130
+105%
60−65
−105%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45
+114%
21−24
−114%
Grand Theft Auto V 134
+106%
65−70
−106%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−33
+114%
14−16
−114%
Metro Exodus 55
+104%
27−30
−104%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+106%
50−55
−106%
Valorant 300
+114%
140−150
−114%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 97
+116%
45−50
−116%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+107%
27−30
−107%
Cyberpunk 2077 33
+106%
16−18
−106%
Dota 2 146
+109%
70−75
−109%
Far Cry 5 80
+129%
35−40
−129%
Forza Horizon 4 114
+107%
55−60
−107%
Hogwarts Legacy 38
+111%
18−20
−111%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 96
+113%
45−50
−113%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 74
+111%
35−40
−111%

This is how TITAN RTX and Quadro P2200 compete in popular games:

  • TITAN RTX is 115% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN RTX is 104% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN RTX is 109% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 45.42 22.54
Recency 18 December 2018 10 June 2019
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 5 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 75 Watt

TITAN RTX has a 101.5% higher aggregate performance score, a 380% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro P2200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and 273.3% lower power consumption.

The TITAN RTX is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P2200 in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN RTX is a desktop card while Quadro P2200 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN RTX
TITAN RTX
NVIDIA Quadro P2200
Quadro P2200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 828 votes

Rate TITAN RTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 419 votes

Rate Quadro P2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about TITAN RTX or Quadro P2200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.