Radeon RX 6700 vs TITAN RTX

Place in performance ranking	58	61
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	11.32	25.55
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	TU102	Navi 22
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	18 December 2018 (5 years old)	9 June 2021 (2 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,499	no data
Current price	$1035 (0.4x MSRP)	$551

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6700 has 126% better value for money than TITAN RTX.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4608	2304
Core clock speed	1350 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1770 MHz	2450 MHz
Number of transistors	18,600 million	17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	280 Watt	175 Watt
Texture fill rate	509.8	352.8

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	10 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	160 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	672.0 GB/s	320.0 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	+	+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	7.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN RTX 48.69
+1.2%

RX 6700 48.13

TITAN RTX outperforms Radeon RX 6700 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

TITAN RTX 18858
+1.1%

RX 6700 18644

TITAN RTX outperforms Radeon RX 6700 by 1% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	162 +1.3%	160−170 −1.3%
1440p	107 +7%	100−110 −7%
4K	77 +2.7%	75−80 −2.7%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

79
+5.3%

75−80

−5.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	104 +4%	100−105 −4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	104 +4%	100−105 −4%
Battlefield 5	163 +1.9%	160−170 −1.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	213 +1.4%	210−220 −1.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	79 +5.3%	75−80 −5.3%
Far Cry 5	165 +3.1%	160−170 −3.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	135 +3.8%	130−140 −3.8%
Forza Horizon 4	187 +3.9%	180−190 −3.9%
Hitman 3	222 +5.7%	210−220 −5.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	142 +1.4%	140−150 −1.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	133 +2.3%	130−140 −2.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	174 +2.4%	170−180 −2.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	112 +1.8%	110−120 −1.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	95 +5.6%	90−95 −5.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	88 +3.5%	85−90 −3.5%
Battlefield 5	164 +2.5%	160−170 −2.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	180 +5.9%	170−180 −5.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	79 +5.3%	75−80 −5.3%
Far Cry 5	156 +4%	150−160 −4%
Far Cry New Dawn	129 +7.5%	120−130 −7.5%
Forza Horizon 4	186 +3.3%	180−190 −3.3%
Hitman 3	206 +3%	200−210 −3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	118 +7.3%	110−120 −7.3%
Metro Exodus	134 +3.1%	130−140 −3.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	93 +3.3%	90−95 −3.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	165 +3.1%	160−170 −3.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	267 +2.7%	260−270 −2.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	97 +2.1%	95−100 −2.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	79 +5.3%	75−80 −5.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	80 +6.7%	75−80 −6.7%
Battlefield 5	160 +6.7%	150−160 −6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	78 +4%	75−80 −4%
Far Cry 5	146 +4.3%	140−150 −4.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	117 +6.4%	110−120 −6.4%
Forza Horizon 4	175 +2.9%	170−180 −2.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	139 +6.9%	130−140 −6.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	86 +1.2%	85−90 −1.2%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	131 +9.2%	120−130 −9.2%
Hitman 3	145 +3.6%	140−150 −3.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90 +5.9%	85−90 −5.9%
Metro Exodus	85 +6.3%	80−85 −6.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	63 +5%	60−65 −5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	121 +10%	110−120 −10%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 +6%	50−55 −6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	66 +1.5%	65−70 −1.5%
Battlefield 5	95−100 +2.1%	95−100 −2.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	66 +1.5%	65−70 −1.5%
Far Cry 5	134 +3.1%	130−140 −3.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	114 +3.6%	110−120 −3.6%
Forza Horizon 4	157 +4.7%	150−160 −4.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 +2.7%	75−80 −2.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70 +7.7%	65−70 −7.7%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	79 +5.3%	75−80 −5.3%
Hitman 3	82 +2.5%	80−85 −2.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27 +12.5%	24−27 −12.5%
Metro Exodus	55 +10%	50−55 −10%
Red Dead Redemption 2	41 +2.5%	40−45 −2.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	66 +1.5%	65−70 −1.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	103 +3%	100−105 −3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	52 +4%	50−55 −4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	43 +7.5%	40−45 −7.5%
Battlefield 5	97 +2.1%	95−100 −2.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	33 +10%	30−33 −10%
Far Cry 5	80 +6.7%	75−80 −6.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	82 +2.5%	80−85 −2.5%
Forza Horizon 4	114 +3.6%	110−120 −3.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	43 +7.5%	40−45 −7.5%

This is how TITAN RTX and RX 6700 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

TITAN RTX is 1.3% faster than RX 6700

1440p resolution:

TITAN RTX is 7% faster than RX 6700

4K resolution:

TITAN RTX is 2.7% faster than RX 6700

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	48.69	48.13
Recency	18 December 2018	9 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	10 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	280 Watt	175 Watt