To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.
P3000 Mobile vs RTX 3000 Mobile
Price now
537$
Games supported
100%
- Interface MXM-B (3.0)
- Core clock speed 1088
- Max video memory 6GB
- Memory type GDDR5
- Memory clock speed 7008
- Maximum resolution
- Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
- Core clock speed 945
- Max video memory 6 GB
- Memory type GDDR6
- Memory clock speed 14000
- Maximum resolution
Price now
2393$
Games supported
100%
General info
Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.
| Place in performance rating | 55 | 23 |
| Value for money | 42.23 | 12.78 |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | Turing (2018−2021) |
| GPU code name | N17E-Q1 | N19E-Q1 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 11 January 2017 (5 years ago) | 27 May 2019 (3 years ago) |
| Current price | $537 | $2393 |
Value for money
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1280 | 1920 |
| Core clock speed | 1088 MHz | 945 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1215 MHz | 1380 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 7,200 million | 10,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 97.20 | 198.7 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,110 gflops | no data |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Quadro P3000 Mobile and Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.4 | no data |
| G-SYNC support | no data | + |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | no data |
| 3D Stereo | + | no data |
| Mosaic | + | no data |
| VR Ready | no data | + |
| nView Display Management | + | no data |
| Optimus | + | no data |
API support
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 7.5 |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- 3DMark Vantage Performance
- 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
- 3DMark Fire Strike Score
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
- SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
- SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
- SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
- SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
- SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
- SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase
- SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
- SPECviewperf 12 - Maya
- SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
- SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
- SPECviewperf 12 - Catia
- SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks
- SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX
- SPECviewperf 12 - Creo
- SPECviewperf 12 - Medical
- SPECviewperf 12 - Energy
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
Benchmark coverage: 3%
Benchmark coverage: 2%
Benchmark coverage: 2%
Benchmark coverage: 2%
Benchmark coverage: 2%
Benchmark coverage: 2%
Benchmark coverage: 2%
This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.
Benchmark coverage: 2%
Benchmark coverage: 2%
Benchmark coverage: 2%
Benchmark coverage: 2%
Benchmark coverage: 2%
Benchmark coverage: 2%
Benchmark coverage: 2%
Benchmark coverage: 2%
Benchmark coverage: 2%
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 64
−45.3%
| 93
+45.3%
|
| 4K | 28
−214%
| 88
+214%
|
Popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 55−60
−40%
|
77
+40%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 55−60
−65.5%
|
91
+65.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Hitman 3 | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 55−60
−81.8%
|
100
+81.8%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 55−60
−12.7%
|
62
+12.7%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 55−60
−56.4%
|
86
+56.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Hitman 3 | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Metro Exodus | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 55−60
−52.7%
|
84
+52.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 63
−73%
|
109
+73%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 55−60
+41%
|
39
−41%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 55−60
−40%
|
77
+40%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 33
−69.7%
|
56
+69.7%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Hitman 3 | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Metro Exodus | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Hitman 3 | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Metro Exodus | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 22
−200%
|
65−70
+200%
|
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 55−60
−20%
|
65−70
+20%
|
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance rating | 55.19 | 66.31 |
| Novelty | 11 January 2017 | 27 May 2019 |
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1280 | 1920 |
| Memory bandwidth | 168 | 448 |
| Chip lithography | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 80 Watt |
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends
since it shows better performance.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Competitors of Quadro P3000 Mobile by AMD
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Quadro P3000 Mobile from AMD is Radeon Pro 5600M, which is slower by 44% and lower by 105 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro P3000 Mobile:
Competitors of Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by AMD
It seems that there's no AMD equivalent for Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile. The nearest candidate is Radeon Pro 5600M, however, it's 53% slower and lower by 137 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile:
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
