Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh vs P4200

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking196not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation7.56no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameGP104TU104B
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date7 May 2018 (5 years ago)8 June 2020 (3 years ago)
Current price$1526 no data

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23043072
Core clock speed1215 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1480 MHz1545 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate237.2296.6

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Quadro P4200 and Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed7132 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.140
CUDA6.17.5

Pros & Cons Summary


Recency 7 May 2018 8 June 2020
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 110 Watt

We couldn't decide between Quadro P4200 and Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P4200
Quadro P4200
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 52 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

This video card has no user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.