Arc A370M vs Quadro P4200

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P4200 with Arc A370M, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P4200
2018
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
24.26
+89.7%

P4200 outperforms Arc A370M by an impressive 90% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking232400
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.1525.83
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGP104DG2-128
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 February 2018 (7 years ago)30 March 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041024
Core clock speed1227 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1647 MHz1550 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate237.299.20
Floating-point processing power7.589 TFLOPS3.174 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs14464
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P4200 24.26
+89.7%
Arc A370M 12.79

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P4200 10729
+110%
Arc A370M 5115

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70−75
+79.5%
39
−79.5%
1440p35−40
+75%
20
−75%
4K60−65
+76.5%
34
−76.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+97.1%
65−70
−97.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+10.9%
46
−10.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+11.6%
43
−11.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+74.1%
50−55
−74.1%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+97.1%
65−70
−97.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+37.8%
37
−37.8%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+59.2%
49
−59.2%
Fortnite 110−120
+62.5%
70−75
−62.5%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+77.4%
50−55
−77.4%
Forza Horizon 5 75−80
+92.3%
35−40
−92.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+60%
30
−60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+104%
45−50
−104%
Valorant 160−170
+49.5%
100−110
−49.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+74.1%
50−55
−74.1%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+97.1%
65−70
−97.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+44.9%
170−180
−44.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+104%
25
−104%
Dota 2 120−130
+77.9%
68
−77.9%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+69.6%
46
−69.6%
Fortnite 110−120
+62.5%
70−75
−62.5%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+77.4%
50−55
−77.4%
Forza Horizon 5 75−80
+92.3%
35−40
−92.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
+197%
29
−197%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+140%
20
−140%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+52.9%
34
−52.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+104%
45−50
−104%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+32.1%
53
−32.1%
Valorant 160−170
+49.5%
100−110
−49.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+74.1%
50−55
−74.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+143%
21
−143%
Dota 2 120−130
+83.3%
66
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+81.4%
43
−81.4%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+77.4%
50−55
−77.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+269%
13
−269%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+104%
45−50
−104%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+169%
26
−169%
Valorant 160−170
+49.5%
100−110
−49.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+62.5%
70−75
−62.5%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+126%
21−24
−126%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+79.6%
90−95
−79.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+291%
11
−291%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+55%
20
−55%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+60.6%
100−110
−60.6%
Valorant 200−210
+52.6%
130−140
−52.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+94.1%
30−35
−94.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+109%
10−12
−109%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+82.8%
29
−82.8%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+103%
30−33
−103%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+111%
18−20
−111%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+107%
27−30
−107%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+229%
7−8
−229%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+83.3%
24−27
−83.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+119%
16−18
−119%
Valorant 130−140
+106%
65−70
−106%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+112%
16−18
−112%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+229%
7−8
−229%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Dota 2 75−80
+95%
40
−95%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+108%
12−14
−108%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+90.9%
21−24
−90.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+108%
12−14
−108%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%

This is how Quadro P4200 and Arc A370M compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is 79% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P4200 is 75% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P4200 is 76% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P4200 is 291% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Quadro P4200 surpassed Arc A370M in all 66 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.26 12.79
Recency 21 February 2018 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 35 Watt

Quadro P4200 has a 89.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Arc A370M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 166.7% more advanced lithography process, and 185.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A370M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P4200 is a mobile workstation card while Arc A370M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P4200
Quadro P4200
Intel Arc A370M
Arc A370M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 59 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 185 votes

Rate Arc A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P4200 or Arc A370M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.