Intel Arc A370M: specs and benchmarks
- Interface PCIe 4.0 x8
- Core clock speed 1550
- Max video memory 4 GB
- Memory type GDDR6
- Memory clock speed 14000
- Maximum resolution
Summary
Intel started Arc A370M sales 30 March 2022. This is a Xe HPG architecture notebook card based on 6 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at gamers. 4 GB of GDDR6 memory clocked at 14 GHz are supplied, and together with 64 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 96 GB/s.
Compatibility-wise, this is card attached via PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. Power consumption is at 50 Watt (35 - 50 Watt TGP).
It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at
of a leader's which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General info
Some basic facts about Arc A370M: architecture, market segment, release date etc.
| Place in performance rating | 264 | |
| Architecture | Xe HPG (2020−2022) | |
| GPU code name | Alchemist | |
| Market segment | Laptop | |
| Release date | 30 March 2022 (1 year old) |
Technical specs
Arc A370M's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Arc A370M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 8 | of 20480 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT) |
| Core clock speed | 1550 MHz | of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) |
| Boost clock speed | 1550 MHz | of 3599 (Radeon RX 7990 XTX) |
| Number of transistors | 7,200 million | of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | of 4 (GeForce RTX 4080 Ti) |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 50 Watt (35 - 50 Watt TGP) | of 2400 (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem) |
| Texture fill rate | 99.20 | of 969.9 (H100 SXM5 96 GB) |
Dimensions and compatibility
Information on Arc A370M's compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed on Arc A370M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | of 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | of 22400 (GeForce RTX 4080) |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | of 14400 (Radeon R7 M260) |
| Shared memory | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Arc A370M. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.
| Display Connectors | No outputs |
API support
APIs supported by Arc A370M, sometimes including their particular versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.3 |
Benchmark performance
Synthetic benchmark performance of Arc A370M. Overall performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- Passmark
- 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
- 3DMark Fire Strike Score
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 24%
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 16%
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
3DMark Fire Strike Score
Benchmark coverage: 13%
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
Send your test results of Arc A370M.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good Arc A370M is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.
Average FPS
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 45 | |
| 1440p | 21 | |
| 4K | 34 |
Popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 46 |
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 30−35 | |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 33 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60 | |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 40−45 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 37 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 49 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 40−45 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60 | |
| Hitman 3 | 55 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 40 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 27−30 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 49 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 45 |
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 30−35 | |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 20 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60 | |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 40−45 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 25 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 46 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 40−45 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60 | |
| Hitman 3 | 48 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 33 | |
| Metro Exodus | 34 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 27−30 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 36 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 53 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 34 |
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 30−35 | |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 18 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 43 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 40−45 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 26 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 15 |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 24−27 | |
| Hitman 3 | 23 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 23 | |
| Metro Exodus | 20 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 12−14 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 20 |
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 16−18 | |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 13 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 29 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 30−33 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 11 |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−12 | |
| Hitman 3 | 14−16 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12 | |
| Metro Exodus | 8−9 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 10−11 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16 |
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 9−10 | |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 7−8 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 16−18 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 14−16 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 6−7 |
Relative perfomance
Overall Arc A370M performance compared to nearest competitors among notebook video cards.
Similar GPUs
Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Recommended processors
These processors are most commonly used with Arc A370M according to our statistics.
