Arc A350M vs Quadro P4200

Place in the ranking	257	404
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	17.66	40.28
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	GP104	DG2-128
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	21 February 2018 (7 years ago)	30 March 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	768
Core clock speed	1227 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	1647 MHz	1150 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	237.2	55.20
Floating-point processing power	7.589 TFLOPS	1.766 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	24
TMUs	144	48
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1502 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.3 GB/s	112.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	6.1	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	60−65 +66.7%	36 −66.7%
1440p	27−30 +58.8%	17 −58.8%
4K	14−16 +55.6%	9 −55.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	130−140 +78.7%	75−80 −78.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +88.9%	27 −88.9%
God of War	50−55 +127%	22 −127%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 +62.1%	55−60 −62.1%
Counter-Strike 2	130−140 +78.7%	75−80 −78.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +168%	19 −168%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +83.3%	42 −83.3%
Fortnite	110−120 +51.9%	75−80 −51.9%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +67.9%	55−60 −67.9%
Forza Horizon 5	70−75 +48%	50 −48%
God of War	50−55 +178%	18 −178%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	90−95 +87.8%	45−50 −87.8%
Valorant	160−170 +42.6%	110−120 −42.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 +62.1%	55−60 −62.1%
Counter-Strike 2	130−140 +78.7%	75−80 −78.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	250−260 +37.1%	180−190 −37.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +219%	16 −219%
Dota 2	120−130 +95.2%	62 −95.2%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +97.4%	39 −97.4%
Fortnite	110−120 +51.9%	75−80 −51.9%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +67.9%	55−60 −67.9%
Forza Horizon 5	70−75 +57.4%	47 −57.4%
God of War	50−55 +233%	15 −233%
Grand Theft Auto V	85−90 +231%	26 −231%
Metro Exodus	50−55 +85.7%	27−30 −85.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	90−95 +87.8%	45−50 −87.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	70−75 +62.8%	43 −62.8%
Valorant	160−170 +42.6%	110−120 −42.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 +62.1%	55−60 −62.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +325%	12 −325%
Dota 2	120−130 +105%	59 −105%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +108%	37 −108%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +67.9%	55−60 −67.9%
God of War	50−55 +355%	11 −355%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	90−95 +87.8%	45−50 −87.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	70−75 +268%	19 −268%
Valorant	160−170 +42.6%	110−120 −42.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite

110−120
+51.9%

75−80

−51.9%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	50−55 +100%	24−27 −100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	160−170 +66.3%	100−110 −66.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	40−45 +330%	10 −330%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +93.8%	16−18 −93.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +47.1%	110−120 −47.1%
Valorant	200−210 +44.3%	140−150 −44.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +78.4%	35−40 −78.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +109%	10−12 −109%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +116%	25 −116%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +87.5%	30−35 −87.5%
God of War	27−30 +86.7%	14−16 −86.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +100%	18−20 −100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

55−60
+93.1%

27−30

−93.1%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +156%	9−10 −156%
Grand Theft Auto V	40−45 +300%	11 −300%
Metro Exodus	20−22 +122%	9−10 −122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +133%	15 −133%
Valorant	130−140 +89%	70−75 −89%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +89.5%	18−20 −89.5%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +156%	9−10 −156%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +100%	5−6 −100%
Dota 2	75−80 +62.5%	45−50 −62.5%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +125%	12 −125%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +78.3%	21−24 −78.3%
God of War	18−20 +90%	10−11 −90%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27 +92.3%	12−14 −92.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

24−27
+100%

12−14

−100%

This is how Quadro P4200 and Arc A350M compete in popular games:

Quadro P4200 is 67% faster in 1080p
Quadro P4200 is 59% faster in 1440p
Quadro P4200 is 56% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in God of War, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P4200 is 355% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, Quadro P4200 surpassed Arc A350M in all 65 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	23.14	13.20
Recency	21 February 2018	30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	25 Watt