Arc A370M vs Quadro P4000 Mobile

Place in performance ranking	239	315
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	5.97	no data
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Xe HPG (2020−2022)
GPU code name	N17E-Q3	Alchemist
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	11 January 2017 (7 years ago)	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$819.61	no data
Current price	$1053 (1.3x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1792	8
Core clock speed	1202 MHz	1550 MHz
Boost clock speed	1228 MHz	1550 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	50 Watt (35 - 50 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	137.4	99.20
Floating-point performance	4,398 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P4000 Mobile and Arc A370M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x8

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	6006 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192 GB/s	96 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.4	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
3D Stereo	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	6.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P4000 Mobile 21.15
+34.1%

Arc A370M 15.77

Quadro P4000 Mobile outperforms Arc A370M by 34% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

P4000 Mobile 15433
+27.7%

Arc A370M 12090

Quadro P4000 Mobile outperforms Arc A370M by 28% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

P4000 Mobile 12259
+50.4%

Arc A370M 8149

Quadro P4000 Mobile outperforms Arc A370M by 50% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

P4000 Mobile 53834
+51.2%

Arc A370M 35604

Quadro P4000 Mobile outperforms Arc A370M by 51% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	50−55 +28.2%	39 −28.2%
1440p	27−30 +28.6%	21 −28.6%
4K	45−50 +32.4%	34 −32.4%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	21.15	15.77
Recency	11 January 2017	30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	50 Watt