Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
2020
28 Watt
9.21

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking486461
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.55no data
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9696
Core clock speed400 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1350 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology10 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Wattno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR4
Shared memory++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync++

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_1DirectX 12_1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 9.21
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 9.95
+8%

  • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 5139
+2.8%
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 5000

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27
+0%
27−30
+0%
1440p16
+0%
16−18
+0%
4K12
+0%
12−14
+0%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 26
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Counter-Strike 2 15
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Atomic Heart 18
+0%
18−20
+0%
Battlefield 5 41
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 13
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 26
−19.2%
30−35
+19.2%
Fortnite 30
−86.7%
55−60
+86.7%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−7.9%
40−45
+7.9%
Forza Horizon 5 22
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−6.5%
30−35
+6.5%
Valorant 124
+37.8%
90−95
−37.8%
Atomic Heart 12
+0%
12−14
+0%
Battlefield 5 35
−17.1%
40−45
+17.1%
Counter-Strike 2 12
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 96
−47.9%
140−150
+47.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Dota 2 51
−33.3%
65−70
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 25
−24%
30−35
+24%
Fortnite 21
−167%
55−60
+167%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−7.9%
40−45
+7.9%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
−106%
35−40
+106%
Metro Exodus 15
−26.7%
18−20
+26.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−6.5%
30−35
+6.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+25%
24−27
−25%
Valorant 112
+24.4%
90−95
−24.4%
Battlefield 5 30
−36.7%
40−45
+36.7%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+10%
10−11
−10%
Dota 2 47
−44.7%
65−70
+44.7%
Far Cry 5 23
−34.8%
30−35
+34.8%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−7.9%
40−45
+7.9%
Forza Horizon 5 22
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−6.5%
30−35
+6.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Valorant 23
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Fortnite 15
−273%
55−60
+273%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
−7.6%
70−75
+7.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 7
−85.7%
12−14
+85.7%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−2.3%
45−50
+2.3%
Valorant 95−100
−7.2%
100−110
+7.2%
Battlefield 5 20−22
−15%
21−24
+15%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 16
−25%
20−22
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−4.8%
21−24
+4.8%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Fortnite 18−20
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%
Atomic Heart 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 8
−150%
20−22
+150%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
+20%
10−11
−20%
Valorant 45−50
−8.9%
45−50
+8.9%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 20
−70%
30−35
+70%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Fortnite 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%

This is how Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 compete in popular games:

  • A tie in 1080p
  • A tie in 1440p
  • A tie in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 38% faster.
  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the Epic Preset, the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 273% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is ahead in 4 tests (10%)
  • Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is ahead in 36 tests (86%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.21 9.95

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 has a 8% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6
1006 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9
16 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs or Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.