UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Place in performance ranking	437	619
Place by popularity	81	not in top-100
Architecture	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	Tiger Lake Xe	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	15 August 2020 (3 years ago)	15 August 2020 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	48
Core clock speed	400 MHz	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	1350 MHz	1450 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	28 Watt	28 Watt

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

12_1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 9.43
+107%

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 4.55

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs outperforms UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs by 107% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 6524
+85.9%

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 3510

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs outperforms UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs by 86% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 25394
+138%

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 10650

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs outperforms UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs by 138% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 5139
+121%

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 2321

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs outperforms UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs by 121% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 26930
+68.4%

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 15992

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs outperforms UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs by 68% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 208526
+114%

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 97416

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs outperforms UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs by 114% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	26 +52.9%	17 −52.9%
1440p	16 +129%	7−8 −129%
4K	12 +140%	5−6 −140%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	22	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21	no data
Battlefield 5	27−30	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	36	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	16	no data
Far Cry 5	21−24	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27	no data
Forza Horizon 4	45−50	no data
Hitman 3	24	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	46	no data
Metro Exodus	35	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	17	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	38	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	22	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	19	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18	no data
Battlefield 5	27−30	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	32	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	13	no data
Far Cry 5	21−24	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27	no data
Forza Horizon 4	45−50	no data
Hitman 3	22	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	112	no data
Metro Exodus	28	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	15	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	84	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	23	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	11	no data
Far Cry 5	21−24	no data
Forza Horizon 4	45−50	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	23	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35	no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16	no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	7	no data
Far Cry 5	16	no data
Forza Horizon 4	16−18	no data
Hitman 3	12−14	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22	no data
Metro Exodus	12−14	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	19 +111%	9−10 −111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6	no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8	no data
Hitman 3	5−6	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12	no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	no data
Far Cry 5	5−6	no data
Forza Horizon 4	12−14	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11	no data
Metro Exodus	10−11	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4	no data