Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

Place in performance ranking	416	492
Place by popularity	not in top-100	59
Architecture	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	Tiger Lake Xe	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	15 August 2020 (3 years ago)	15 August 2020 (3 years ago)

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	80
Core clock speed	no data	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1350 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	28 Watt

Memory type	DDR4	no data
Shared memory	+	+

Supported Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

DirectX 12_1

12_1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 9.98
+31.3%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 7.60

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs by 31% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 5000
+24.7%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 4010

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs by 25% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	24−27 +26.3%	19 −26.3%
1440p	12−14 +20%	10 −20%
4K	18−20 +28.6%	14 −28.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +40%	14−16 −40%
Battlefield 5	30−35 +30.8%	26 −30.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +28.6%	21−24 −28.6%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +25%	20 −25%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +0%	27 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +34.6%	24−27 −34.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 +33.3%	15 −33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −35.3%	23 +35.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +23.5%	17 −23.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +40%	14−16 −40%
Battlefield 5	30−35 +47.8%	23 −47.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +28.6%	21−24 −28.6%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +31.6%	19 −31.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +8%	25 −8%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +34.6%	24−27 −34.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 +186%	7 −186%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +25%	12 −25%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +183%	6 −183%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +16.7%	18 −16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −10%	22 +10%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +40%	14−16 −40%
Battlefield 5	30−35 +47.8%	23 −47.8%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +38.9%	18 −38.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +22.7%	22 −22.7%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +34.6%	24−27 −34.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 +81.8%	11 −81.8%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +27.3%	10−12 −27.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +23.1%	12−14 −23.1%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Battlefield 5	16−18 +88.9%	9−10 −88.9%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +33.3%	12 −33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +45.5%	10−12 −45.5%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +38.5%	12−14 −38.5%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Battlefield 5	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%

This is how Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compete in popular games:

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 26.3% faster than Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs in 1080p
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 20% faster than Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs in 1440p
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 28.6% faster than Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 186% faster than the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs.
in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 35.3% faster than the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.

All in all, in popular games: