Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
AMD FirePro M4000: specs and benchmarks
Price now
433$
Games supported
61%
- Interface MXM-A (3.0)
- Core clock speed 600
- Max video memory 1024 MB
- Memory type GDDR5
- Memory clock speed 4500
- Maximum resolution Depends on system
Year of release
2012
Performance
4.09
Summary
AMD started FirePro M4000 sales 1 July 2012. This is a GCN architecture notebook card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. 1 GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 4.5 GHz are supplied, and together with 128 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 72 GB/s.
Compatibility-wise, this is card attached via MXM-A (3.0) interface. Power consumption is at 33 Watt.
It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at
4.09%
of a leader's which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General info
Some basic facts about FirePro M4000: architecture, market segment, release date etc.
| Place in performance ranking | 595 | |
| Value for money | 0.20 | |
| Architecture | GCN (2011−2017) | |
| GPU code name | Cape Verde GLM | |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 (10 years old) | |
| Current price | $433 | of 158889 (A100 PCIe) |
Value for money
Technical specs
FirePro M4000's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of FirePro M4000's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 512 | of 20480 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT) |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) |
| Number of transistors | 1,500 million | of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | of 4 (GeForce RTX 4080) |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | of 2400 (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem) |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | of 969.9 (H100 SXM5 96 GB) |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | of 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo) |
Size and compatibility
Information on FirePro M4000's compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed on FirePro M4000: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | of 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | of 22400 (GeForce RTX 4080) |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | of 3276 (Aldebaran) |
| Shared memory | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on FirePro M4000. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| StereoOutput3D | 1 |
API support
APIs supported by FirePro M4000, sometimes including their particular versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 |
Benchmark performance
Synthetic benchmark performance of FirePro M4000. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 24%
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 16%
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 16%
3DMark Fire Strike Score
Benchmark coverage: 13%
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 9%
Unigine Heaven 3.0
This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.
Benchmark coverage: 4%
Send in your benchmark results
Send your test results of FirePro M4000.
Mining hashrates
Cryptocurrency mining performance of FirePro M4000. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good FirePro M4000 is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 25 |
Performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4 |
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 7−8 | |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 5−6 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14 | |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 14−16 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 9−10 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14 | |
| Hitman 3 | 8−9 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 6−7 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 8−9 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 5−6 |
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 7−8 | |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 5−6 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14 | |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 14−16 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 9−10 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14 | |
| Hitman 3 | 8−9 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 6−7 | |
| Metro Exodus | 5−6 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 8−9 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 5−6 |
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 7−8 | |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 5−6 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 9−10 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 5−6 |
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 6−7 | |
| Hitman 3 | 7−8 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 6−7 | |
| Metro Exodus | 5−6 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5−6 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2 | |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 7−8 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2 |
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4 | |
| Hitman 3 | 4−5 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 4−5 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 2−3 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4 |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 2−3 | |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 1−2 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 8−9 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2 |
Relative perfomance
Overall FirePro M4000 performance compared to nearest competitors among mobile workstation video cards.
NVIDIA equivalent
According to our data, the closest NVIDIA alternative to FirePro M4000 is Quadro K3000M, which is faster by 2% and higher by 5 positions in our ranking.
Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to FirePro M4000:
Similar GPUs
Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Recommended processors
These processors are most commonly used with FirePro M4000 according to our statistics.
16.1%
15.3%
10.2%
10.2%
8.5%
5.1%
3.4%
3.4%
3.4%
3.4%
