FirePro M4000: specs and benchmarks
Aggregate performance score
FirePro M4000 provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at 3.60% of a leader's which is RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell.
Contents
Summary
AMD started FirePro M4000 sales 27 June 2012. This is a GCN 1.0 architecture notebook card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. 1 GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 1 GHz are supplied, and together with 128 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 72 GB/s.
Compatibility-wise, this is a graphics card attached via MXM-A (3.0) interface. Power consumption is at 33 Watt.
Primary details
Some basic facts about FirePro M4000: architecture, market segment, release date etc.
| Place in the ranking | 739 | |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | |
| Power efficiency | 8.78 | of 100.00 (Radeon 890M) |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) | |
| GPU code name | Chelsea | |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | |
| Release date | 27 June 2012 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
FirePro M4000's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of FirePro M4000's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 512 | of 960 (GeForce GTX 660) |
| Core clock speed | 675 MHz | of 980 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) |
| Number of transistors | 1,500 million | of 100,000 million (Data Center GPU Max 1100) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | of 0.003 MB (Arc Graphics 140V) |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | of 235 (FirePro S9150) |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | of 1,968.0 (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server) |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.6912 TFLOPS | of 126 (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server) |
| ROPs | 16 | of 512 (Moore Threads MTT S4000) |
| TMUs | 32 | of 896 (Data Center GPU Max 1350) |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | of 64 MB (Data Center GPU Max 1550) |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | of 408 MB (Data Center GPU Max 1350) |
Form factor & compatibility
This section provides details about the physical dimensions of FirePro M4000 and its compatibility with other computer components. This information is useful when selecting a computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards, it includes details about the interface and bus (for motherboard compatibility) and additional power connectors (for power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of memory installed on FirePro M4000: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | of 288 GB (Radeon Instinct MI325X) |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | of 384 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | of 16384000 MB (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | of 983040 MB (GeForce RTX 5080) |
| Shared memory | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on FirePro M4000. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| StereoOutput3D | + |
API and SDK support
APIs supported by FirePro M4000, sometimes including their particular versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 |
Benchmark performance
Synthetic benchmark performance of FirePro M4000. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
Unigine Heaven 3.0
This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.
Send your test results of FirePro M4000.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good FirePro M4000 is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 27 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9 | |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 9−10 |
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 14−16 | |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14 | |
| Fortnite | 21−24 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20 | |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 10−11 | |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 9−10 | |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18 | |
| Valorant | 50−55 |
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 14−16 | |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16 | |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 65−70 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9 | |
| Dota 2 | 35−40 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14 | |
| Fortnite | 21−24 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20 | |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 10−11 | |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14 | |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 9−10 | |
| Metro Exodus | 7−8 | |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14 | |
| Valorant | 50−55 |
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 14−16 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9 | |
| Dota 2 | 35−40 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20 | |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 9−10 | |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14 | |
| Valorant | 50−55 |
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 21−24 |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9 | |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 27−30 | |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 3−4 | |
| Metro Exodus | 2−3 | |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−33 | |
| Valorant | 40−45 |
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 7−8 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10 | |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 4−5 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6 |
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 7−8 |
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18 | |
| Valorant | 18−20 |
4K
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | |
| Dota 2 | 12−14 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6 | |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 4−5 |
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 4−5 |
NVIDIA equivalent
According to our data, the closest NVIDIA alternative to FirePro M4000 is Quadro K3000M, which is faster by 2% and higher by 3 positions in our ranking.
Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to FirePro M4000:
Similar GPUs
Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Recommended processors
These processors are most commonly used with FirePro M4000 according to our statistics.
