Radeon HD 7650A vs FirePro M4000

Place in performance ranking	650	940
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.42	0.23
Architecture	GCN (2011−2017)	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code name	Cape Verde GLM	Onega
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	1 July 2012 (11 years ago)	5 January 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$262
Current price	$433	$46 (0.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FirePro M4000 has 83% better value for money than HD 7650A.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	480
Core clock speed	600 MHz	600 MHz
Number of transistors	1,500 million	716 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	33 Watt	33 Watt
Texture fill rate	21.60	14.40
Floating-point performance	691.2 gflops	576.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on FirePro M4000 and Radeon HD 7650A compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	n/a	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	MXM-A (3.0)
Width	no data	MXM Module
Form factor	MXM-A	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4500 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	72 GB/s	28.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
StereoOutput3D	1	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro M4000 4.15
+180%

HD 7650A 1.48

FirePro M4000 outperforms Radeon HD 7650A by 180% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FirePro M4000 1604
+181%

HD 7650A 570

FirePro M4000 outperforms Radeon HD 7650A by 181% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

32
+220%

10−12

−220%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

18−20

+157%

7−8
−157%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +163%	8−9 −163%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Battlefield 5	27−30 +170%	10−11 −170%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +167%	9−10 −167%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +157%	7−8 −157%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +167%	9−10 −167%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 +173%	10−12 −173%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +163%	18−20 −163%
Hitman 3	21−24 +163%	8−9 −163%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +161%	21−24 −161%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +167%	6−7 −167%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 +173%	10−12 −173%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +167%	14−16 −167%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +175%	20−22 −175%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +163%	8−9 −163%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Battlefield 5	27−30 +170%	10−11 −170%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +167%	9−10 −167%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +157%	7−8 −157%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +167%	9−10 −167%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 +173%	10−12 −173%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +163%	18−20 −163%
Hitman 3	21−24 +163%	8−9 −163%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +161%	21−24 −161%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +167%	6−7 −167%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 +173%	10−12 −173%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +167%	14−16 −167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +167%	9−10 −167%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +175%	20−22 −175%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +163%	8−9 −163%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +167%	9−10 −167%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +157%	7−8 −157%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +167%	9−10 −167%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +163%	18−20 −163%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +161%	21−24 −161%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +167%	14−16 −167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +167%	9−10 −167%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +175%	20−22 −175%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−33
+173%

10−12

−173%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +163%	8−9 −163%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +180%	5−6 −180%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +167%	6−7 −167%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +167%	6−7 −167%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +157%	7−8 −157%
Hitman 3	24−27 +167%	9−10 −167%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +170%	10−11 −170%
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

+163%

8−9
−163%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Hitman 3	0−1	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +167%	6−7 −167%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%