Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta vs FirePro M4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking761not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.86no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Fahrenheit (1998−2000)
GPU code nameChelseaNV5 B5
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 June 2012 (13 years ago)22 March 1999 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed675 MHz100 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million15 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Wattno data
Texture fill rate21.600.2
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs322
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Form factorMXM-Ano data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz133 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s1.064 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA
StereoOutput3D+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)6.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 June 2012 22 March 1999
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 250 nm

FirePro M4000 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 792.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M4000 and Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M4000 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M4000
FirePro M4000
NVIDIA Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta
Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 39 votes

Rate FirePro M4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 15 votes

Rate Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M4000 or Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.