Quadro K3000M: specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregated performance score

It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at 4.25% of a leader's which is GeForce RTX 4090.

RTX 4090GeForce RTX4090
Compare

Summary

NVIDIA started Quadro K3000M sales 1 June 2012 at a recommended price of $155 . This is a Kepler architecture notebook card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. 2 GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 2.8 GHz are supplied, and together with 256 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Compatibility-wise, this is card attached via MXM-B (3.0) interface. Power consumption is at 75 Watt.

General info

Some basic facts about Quadro K3000M: architecture, market segment, release date etc.

Place in performance ranking635
Place by popularitynot in top-100
Value for money0.81
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameN14E-Q1
Market segmentMobile workstation
Release date1 June 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$155
Current price$223 (1.4x MSRP)of 168889 (A100 PCIe 80 GB)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Technical specs

Quadro K3000M's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro K3000M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores576of 20480 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT)
Core clock speed654 MHzof 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT)
Number of transistors3,540 millionof 14400 (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile)
Manufacturing process technology28 nmof 4 (Radeon 780M)
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattof 2400 (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem)
Texture fill rate31.39of 969.9 (H100 SXM5 96 GB)
Floating-point performance753.4 gflopsof 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo)

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro K3000M's compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelarge
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)

Memory

Parameters of memory installed on Quadro K3000M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.

Memory typeGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GBof 192 (Radeon Instinct MI300X)
Memory bus width256 Bitof 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory clock speed2800 MHzof 23000 (GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER)
Memory bandwidth89.6 GB/sof 3276 (Aldebaran)
Shared memory-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro K3000M. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs

Technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro K3000M. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+

API support

APIs supported by Quadro K3000M, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.1
OpenGL4.6
OpenCL1.2
Vulkan+
CUDA+

Benchmark performance

Synthetic benchmark performance of Quadro K3000M. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K3000M 4.25

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

K3000M 1647

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

K3000M 11902

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

K3000M 2427

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

K3000M 4247

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

K3000M 14

Gaming performance

Let's see how good Quadro K3000M is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

900p33
Full HD37

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
Battlefield 5 12−14
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
Far Cry 5 8−9
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
Hitman 3 9−10
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
Battlefield 5 12−14
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
Far Cry 5 8−9
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
Hitman 3 9−10
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
Metro Exodus 6−7
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
Battlefield 5 12−14
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
Far Cry 5 8−9
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
Hitman 3 7−8
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
Metro Exodus 2−3
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
Far Cry 5 7−8
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
Hitman 3 4−5
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
Forza Horizon 4 2−3

Relative performance

Overall Quadro K3000M performance compared to nearest competitors among mobile workstation video cards.


FirePro M6000 110.59
Quadro 5010M 107.53
Quadro K3000M 100
Quadro P500 99.06

AMD equivalent

According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to Quadro K3000M is FirePro M4000, which is slower by 3% and lower by 11 positions in our ranking.

FirePro M4000FireProM4000
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro K3000M:

FirePro M6000 110.59
Quadro K3000M 100

Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

FirePro M4000FireProM4000
Compare
Quadro 5010MQuadro5010M
Compare
FirePro M6000FireProM6000
Compare
K2100MQuadroK2100M
Compare
K4000MQuadroK4000M
Compare
Quadro 4000MQuadro4000M
Compare

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with Quadro K3000M according to our statistics.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.


3.5 63 votes

Rate Quadro K3000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Quadro K3000M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.