NVIDIA started Quadro K3000M sales 1 June 2012 at a recommended price of $155 . This is a Kepler architecture notebook card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. 2 GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 0.7 GHz are supplied, and together with 256 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Compatibility-wise, this is a graphics card attached via MXM-B (3.0) interface. Power consumption is at 75 Watt.

Primary details

Some basic facts about Quadro K3000M: architecture, market segment, release date etc.

Place in the ranking	680
Place by popularity	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.72
Power efficiency	3.89	of 100.00 (Radeon 890M)
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	GK104
Market segment	Mobile workstation
Release date	1 June 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$155	of 14,999 (Quadro Plex 7000)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

Quadro K3000M's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro K3000M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	576	of 21760 (GeForce RTX 5090)
Core clock speed	654 MHz	of 2670 MHz (Arc B580)
Number of transistors	3,540 million	of 208,000 million (B200 SXM 192 GB)
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	of 3 nm (Arc Graphics 140V)
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	of 2400 Watt (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem)
Texture fill rate	31.39	of 2,554 (Radeon Instinct MI300X)
Floating-point processing power	0.7534 TFLOPS	of 109.7 (GeForce RTX 5090)
ROPs	32	of 192 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX)
TMUs	48	of 1280 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT)

Form factor & compatibility

This section provides details about the physical dimensions of Quadro K3000M and its compatibility with other computer components. This information is useful when selecting a computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards, it includes details about the interface and bus (for motherboard compatibility) and additional power connectors (for power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of memory installed on Quadro K3000M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.

Memory type	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	of 294912 (Radeon Instinct MI325X)
Memory bus width	256 Bit	of 8192 Bit (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory clock speed	700 MHz	of 20000 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile)
Memory bandwidth	89.6 GB/s	of 5,171 GB/s (Radeon Instinct MI300X)
Shared memory	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro K3000M. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro K3000M. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

APIs supported by Quadro K3000M, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.6
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	+
CUDA	+

Benchmark performance

Synthetic benchmark performance of Quadro K3000M. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K3000M 4.26

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

K3000M 1643

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

K3000M 2427

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

K3000M 11902

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

K3000M 4199

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

K3000M 14

Gaming performance

Let's see how good Quadro K3000M is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

900p	33
Full HD	33

Cost per frame, $

1080p

4.70

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

7−8

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5
Battlefield 5	10−11
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8
Far Cry 5	9−10
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14
Forza Horizon 4	24−27
Hitman 3	10−11
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30
Metro Exodus	9−10
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5
Battlefield 5	10−11
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8
Far Cry 5	9−10
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14
Forza Horizon 4	24−27
Hitman 3	10−11
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30
Metro Exodus	9−10
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8
Far Cry 5	9−10
Forza Horizon 4	24−27
Hitman 3	10−11
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−12

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3
Far Cry 5	5−6
Forza Horizon 4	6−7
Hitman 3	9−10
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11
Metro Exodus	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4
Hitman 3	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2
Metro Exodus	1−2

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3
Forza Horizon 4	3−4
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2