Quadro P620 vs FirePro M4000

Place in the ranking	686	467
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	8.65	16.30
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Chelsea	GP107
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	27 June 2012 (12 years ago)	1 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	512
Core clock speed	675 MHz	1177 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1443 MHz
Number of transistors	1,500 million	3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	33 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	21.60	46.18
Floating-point processing power	0.6912 TFLOPS	1.478 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	n/a	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	145 mm
Width	no data	IGP
Form factor	MXM-A	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth	72 GB/s	96.13 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
StereoOutput3D	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	-	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro M4000 4.13

Quadro P620 9.43
+128%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro M4000 1593

Quadro P620 3638
+128%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

FirePro M4000 1981

Quadro P620 5909
+198%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

FirePro M4000 8628

Quadro P620 25105
+191%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

FirePro M4000 1713

Quadro P620 4673
+173%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

FirePro M4000 12587

Quadro P620 30410
+142%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

FirePro M4000 5532

Quadro P620 12063
+118%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−76%

44
+76%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

7−8

−114%

14−16
+114%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −91.7%	21−24 +91.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%
Battlefield 5	10−11 −190%	27−30 +190%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −111%	18−20 +111%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −114%	14−16 +114%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −144%	21−24 +144%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 −136%	24−27 +136%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −152%	60−65 +152%
Hitman 3	9−10 −100%	18−20 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −85.7%	50−55 +85.7%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −338%	35 +338%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −136%	24−27 +136%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −244%	55 +244%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −41.9%	60−65 +41.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −91.7%	21−24 +91.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%
Battlefield 5	10−11 −190%	27−30 +190%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −111%	18−20 +111%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −114%	14−16 +114%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −144%	21−24 +144%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 −136%	24−27 +136%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −152%	60−65 +152%
Hitman 3	9−10 −100%	18−20 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −85.7%	50−55 +85.7%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −250%	28 +250%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −136%	24−27 +136%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −93.8%	30−35 +93.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −62.5%	24−27 +62.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −41.9%	60−65 +41.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −91.7%	21−24 +91.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −111%	18−20 +111%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −114%	14−16 +114%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −144%	21−24 +144%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −152%	60−65 +152%
Hitman 3	9−10 −100%	18−20 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −85.7%	50−55 +85.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −93.8%	30−35 +93.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −6.3%	17 +6.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −41.9%	60−65 +41.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−12

−136%

24−27
+136%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −125%	18−20 +125%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −133%	14−16 +133%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −200%	9−10 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −120%	10−12 +120%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −583%	40−45 +583%
Hitman 3	9−10 −44.4%	12−14 +44.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −100%	20−22 +100%
Metro Exodus	0−1	12−14
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −200%	9−10 +200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 −131%	60−65 +131%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9

−100%

16−18
+100%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −200%	9−10 +200%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −133%	7−8 +133%
Hitman 3	0−1	5−6
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −3800%	35−40 +3800%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	1−2
Far Cry 5	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6

−80%

9−10
+80%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%

4K
High Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

7−8

+0%

7−8

+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

6−7

+0%

6−7

+0%

This is how FirePro M4000 and Quadro P620 compete in popular games:

Quadro P620 is 76% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P620 is 3800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Quadro P620 is ahead in 65 tests (94%)
there's a draw in 4 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.13	9.43
Recency	27 June 2012	1 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	33 Watt	40 Watt

FirePro M4000 has 21.2% lower power consumption.

Quadro P620, on the other hand, has a 128.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P620 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro M4000 is a mobile workstation card while Quadro P620 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.