UHD Graphics 710 vs Radeon 680M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 680M with UHD Graphics 710, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 680M
2023
50 Watt
8.56
+202%

680M outperforms UHD Graphics 710 by a whopping 202% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking503796
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.9413.12
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameRembrandt+Alder Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 January 2023 (2 years ago)4 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768128
Core clock speed2000 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors13,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate105.610.40
Floating-point processing power3.379 TFLOPS0.3328 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs488
Ray Tracing Cores12no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8Ring Bus
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 680M 8.56
+202%
UHD Graphics 710 2.83

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 680M 3334
+203%
UHD Graphics 710 1100

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD37
+208%
12−14
−208%
1440p19
+217%
6−7
−217%
4K10
+233%
3−4
−233%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 28
+211%
9−10
−211%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
+225%
12−14
−225%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+211%
9−10
−211%
Counter-Strike 2 26
+225%
8−9
−225%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
+250%
4−5
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 56
+211%
18−20
−211%
Forza Horizon 5 38
+217%
12−14
−217%
Metro Exodus 39
+225%
12−14
−225%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%
Valorant 161
+222%
50−55
−222%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+211%
9−10
−211%
Counter-Strike 2 21
+250%
6−7
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+267%
3−4
−267%
Dota 2 48
+243%
14−16
−243%
Far Cry 5 36
+260%
10−11
−260%
Fortnite 50−55
+219%
16−18
−219%
Forza Horizon 4 47
+236%
14−16
−236%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Grand Theft Auto V 36
+260%
10−11
−260%
Metro Exodus 27
+238%
8−9
−238%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+224%
21−24
−224%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+225%
8−9
−225%
Valorant 30
+233%
9−10
−233%
World of Tanks 120−130
+223%
40−45
−223%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+211%
9−10
−211%
Counter-Strike 2 18
+260%
5−6
−260%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+350%
2−3
−350%
Dota 2 61
+239%
18−20
−239%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+260%
10−11
−260%
Forza Horizon 4 40
+233%
12−14
−233%
Forza Horizon 5 26
+225%
8−9
−225%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+224%
21−24
−224%
Valorant 146
+224%
45−50
−224%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 17
+240%
5−6
−240%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
+240%
5−6
−240%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+242%
12−14
−242%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
World of Tanks 60−65
+244%
18−20
−244%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Forza Horizon 4 27
+238%
8−9
−238%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
+240%
5−6
−240%
Valorant 21−24
+214%
7−8
−214%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Dota 2 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+213%
8−9
−213%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Counter-Strike 2 2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2 0−1
Dota 2 18
+260%
5−6
−260%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Fortnite 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 14
+250%
4−5
−250%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Valorant 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

This is how Radeon 680M and UHD Graphics 710 compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 680M is 208% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 680M is 217% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon 680M is 233% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.56 2.83
Recency 3 January 2023 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 6 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 680M has a 202.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

UHD Graphics 710, on the other hand, has 233.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 680M is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 710 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 680M is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 710 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 680M
Radeon 680M
Intel UHD Graphics 710
UHD Graphics 710

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 989 votes

Rate Radeon 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 128 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.