Quadro P4000 vs Radeon RX Vega 56

Place in performance ranking	145	173
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	26.82	25.20
Architecture	Vega (2017−2021)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Vega	GP104
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	14 August 2017 (6 years ago)	6 February 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$399	$815
Current price	$224 (0.6x MSRP)	$485 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX Vega 56 has 6% better value for money than Quadro P4000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3584	1792
Core clock speed	1138 MHz	1202 MHz
Boost clock speed	1474 MHz	1480 MHz
Number of transistors	12,500 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	210 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	329.5	165.8
Floating-point performance	10,566 gflops	5,304 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	241 mm
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	409.6 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	7604 MHz
Memory bandwidth	409.6 GB/s	192 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	no data
Display Port	no data	1.4

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	no data	+
3D Stereo	no data	+
Mosaic	no data	+
nView Display Management	no data	+
Optimus	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.125	+
CUDA	no data	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 56 34.30
+13.9%

Quadro P4000 30.11

Radeon RX Vega 56 outperforms Quadro P4000 by 14% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX Vega 56 13276
+13.9%

Quadro P4000 11654

Radeon RX Vega 56 outperforms Quadro P4000 by 14% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	116 +70.6%	68 −70.6%
1440p	77 +18.5%	65−70 −18.5%
4K	48 +20%	40−45 −20%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

55−60
+15.7%

50−55

−15.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	77 +35.1%	55−60 −35.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 +13.2%	50−55 −13.2%
Battlefield 5	151 +60.6%	90−95 −60.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	90−95 +14.8%	80−85 −14.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +15.7%	50−55 −15.7%
Far Cry 5	98 +25.6%	75−80 −25.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	96 +24.7%	75−80 −24.7%
Forza Horizon 4	141 +45.4%	95−100 −45.4%
Hitman 3	100−110 +16.1%	90−95 −16.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +13.8%	65−70 −13.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 +12.2%	45−50 −12.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	105 +52.2%	65−70 −52.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +14%	55−60 −14%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70 +22.8%	55−60 −22.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 +13.2%	50−55 −13.2%
Battlefield 5	140 +48.9%	90−95 −48.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	90−95 +14.8%	80−85 −14.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +15.7%	50−55 −15.7%
Far Cry 5	93 +19.2%	75−80 −19.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	93 +20.8%	75−80 −20.8%
Forza Horizon 4	134 +38.1%	95−100 −38.1%
Hitman 3	100−110 +16.1%	90−95 −16.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +13.8%	65−70 −13.8%
Metro Exodus	70 +34.6%	50−55 −34.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 +12.2%	45−50 −12.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	91 +31.9%	65−70 −31.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	124 +61%	77 −61%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +14%	55−60 −14%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	52 −9.6%	55−60 +9.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 +13.2%	50−55 −13.2%
Battlefield 5	131 +39.4%	90−95 −39.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +15.7%	50−55 −15.7%
Far Cry 5	89 +14.1%	75−80 −14.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	84 +9.1%	75−80 −9.1%
Forza Horizon 4	109 +12.4%	95−100 −12.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	74 +80.5%	41 −80.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +14%	55−60 −14%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 +16.7%	45−50 −16.7%
Hitman 3	60−65 +19.2%	50−55 −19.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +14.6%	40−45 −14.6%
Metro Exodus	42 +35.5%	30−35 −35.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 +17.4%	21−24 −17.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	58 +38.1%	40−45 −38.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	44 +33.3%	30−35 −33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +19.4%	30−35 −19.4%
Battlefield 5	99 +50%	65−70 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +23.8%	21−24 −23.8%
Far Cry 5	74 +39.6%	50−55 −39.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	74 +27.6%	55−60 −27.6%
Forza Horizon 4	88 +39.7%	60−65 −39.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +20.5%	35−40 −20.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 +16%	24−27 −16%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 +20%	24−27 −20%
Hitman 3	30−35 +17.2%	27−30 −17.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +19%	21−24 −19%
Metro Exodus	27 +35%	20−22 −35%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 +12.5%	16−18 −12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	31 +40.9%	21−24 −40.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	44 +29.4%	30−35 −29.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27 +35%	20−22 −35%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +23.5%	16−18 −23.5%
Battlefield 5	55 +52.8%	35−40 −52.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%
Far Cry 5	39 +44.4%	27−30 −44.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	42 +40%	30−33 −40%
Forza Horizon 4	59 +40.5%	40−45 −40.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 +21.4%	14−16 −21.4%

This is how RX Vega 56 and Quadro P4000 compete in popular games:

RX Vega 56 is 70.6% faster than Quadro P4000 in 1080p
RX Vega 56 is 18.5% faster than Quadro P4000 in 1440p
RX Vega 56 is 20% faster than Quadro P4000 in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX Vega 56 is 80.5% faster than the Quadro P4000.
in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P4000 is 9.6% faster than the RX Vega 56.

All in all, in popular games:

RX Vega 56 is ahead in 67 tests (99%)
Quadro P4000 is ahead in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	34.30	30.11
Recency	14 August 2017	6 February 2017
Cost	$399	$815
Chip lithography	14 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	210 Watt	100 Watt