Tesla K80 vs Quadro GP100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Quadro GP100
2016
16 GB HBM2, 235 Watt
42.36
+180%

Quadro GP100 outperforms Tesla K80 by a whopping 180% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking79329
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.9612.53
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameGP100GK210
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 October 2016 (7 years ago)17 November 2014 (9 years ago)
Current price$1482 $83

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro GP100 has 11% better value for money than Tesla K80.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35842496
Core clock speed1304 MHz562 MHz
Boost clock speed1442 MHz824 MHz
Number of transistors15,300 million7,100 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)235 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate323.0171.4
Floating-point performance10,329 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB12 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1430 MHz5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth732.2 GB/s240.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA6.03.7

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro GP100 42.36
+180%
Tesla K80 15.14

Quadro GP100 outperforms Tesla K80 by 180% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro GP100 16374
+180%
Tesla K80 5852

Quadro GP100 outperforms Tesla K80 by 180% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

Quadro GP100 92763
+477%
Tesla K80 16063

Quadro GP100 outperforms Tesla K80 by 477% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.36 15.14
Recency 1 October 2016 17 November 2014
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 235 Watt 300 Watt

The Quadro GP100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla K80 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro GP100
Quadro GP100
NVIDIA Tesla K80
Tesla K80

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 14 votes

Rate Quadro GP100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 174 votes

Rate Tesla K80 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.