To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.
GP100 vs RTX 4000
- Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
- Core clock speed 1304 MHz
- Max video memory 16 GB
- Memory type HBM2
- Memory clock speed 1430 MHz
- Maximum resolution
- Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.
|Place in performance rating||55||60|
|Value for money||10.27||19.13|
|Architecture||Pascal (2016−2021)||Turing (2018−2021)|
|GPU code name||GP100||TU104|
|Release date||1 October 2016 (5 years ago)||13 November 2018 (3 years ago)|
|Launch price (MSRP)||no data||$899|
|Price now||$2957||$1799 (2x MSRP)|
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
|Pipelines / CUDA cores||3584||no data|
|Core clock speed||1304 MHz||no data|
|Boost clock speed||1442 MHz||no data|
|Number of transistors||15,300 million||13,600 million|
|Manufacturing process technology||16 nm||12 nm|
|Thermal design power (TDP)||235 Watt||no data|
|Texture fill rate||323.0||222.5|
|Floating-point performance||10,329 gflops||no data|
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
|Interface||PCIe 3.0 x16||PCIe 3.0 x16|
|Length||267 mm||241 mm|
|Supplementary power connectors||1x 8-pin||no data|
Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
|Memory type||HBM2||no data|
|Maximum RAM amount||16 GB||no data|
|Memory bus width||4096 Bit||no data|
|Memory clock speed||1430 MHz||no data|
|Memory bandwidth||732.2 GB/s||no data|
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
|Display Connectors||1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort||no data|
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
|DirectX||12 (12_1)||no data|
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- GeekBench 5 CUDA
- GeekBench 5 OpenCL
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages and disadvantages
|Novelty||1 October 2016||13 November 2018|
|Chip lithography||16 nm||12 nm|
Technical City couldn't decide between
The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Competitors of Quadro GP100 by AMD
The nearest Quadro GP100's AMD equivalent is Radeon Pro VII, which is faster by 4% and higher by 6 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro GP100:
Competitors of Quadro RTX 4000 by AMD
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Quadro RTX 4000 from AMD is Radeon Pro W5700, which is slower by 3% and lower by 4 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro RTX 4000:
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.