RTX A2000 Mobile vs Radeon Pro W6600M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pro W6600M
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 90 Watt
35.02
+37.2%

Radeon Pro W6600M outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by a substantial 37% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking136195
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 2 (2020−2022)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 23GA107
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date8 June 2021 (2 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17922560
Core clock speedno data893 MHz
Boost clock speed2903 MHz1687 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate325.1108.6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro W6600M and RTX A2000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s176.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.21.2
CUDAno data8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
+31.6%
76
−31.6%
1440p55−60
+31%
42
−31%
4K55−60
+34.1%
41
−34.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−23.3%
74
+23.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+28.6%
45−50
−28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+10.9%
55
−10.9%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+35.7%
80−85
−35.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
+39.3%
55−60
−39.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−3.3%
62
+3.3%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+23%
60−65
−23%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
+30.4%
65−70
−30.4%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+32.1%
80−85
−32.1%
Hitman 3 85−90
+4.8%
83
−4.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+47.1%
85−90
−47.1%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+25.7%
70−75
−25.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+27.9%
65−70
−27.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
−15.4%
135
+15.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+4.8%
62
−4.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+28.6%
45−50
−28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+56.4%
39
−56.4%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+35.7%
80−85
−35.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
+39.3%
55−60
−39.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+20%
50
−20%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−17.3%
88
+17.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
+150%
36
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+32.1%
80−85
−32.1%
Hitman 3 85−90
+172%
32
−172%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+47.1%
85−90
−47.1%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+31%
71
−31%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+27.9%
65−70
−27.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+41%
83
−41%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
−11.6%
96
+11.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+27.5%
51
−27.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+28.6%
45−50
−28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+90.6%
32
−90.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
+39.3%
55−60
−39.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+46.3%
41
−46.3%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+23%
60−65
−23%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+32.1%
80−85
−32.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+47.1%
85−90
−47.1%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+57.6%
59
−57.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+72%
50
−72%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+124%
29
−124%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+27.9%
65−70
−27.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+36.7%
45−50
−36.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+45.5%
55−60
−45.5%
Hitman 3 45−50
−12.8%
53
+12.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+47.4%
18−20
−47.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+35.7%
27−30
−35.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+40.7%
27
−40.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+48.6%
35−40
−48.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+4%
25
−4%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+18.9%
53
−18.9%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+41.2%
50−55
−41.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+41.5%
50−55
−41.5%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+34.7%
49
−34.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+31.7%
63
−31.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+54.8%
30−35
−54.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
+50%
20
−50%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 55−60
−10.3%
64
+10.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+51.7%
27−30
−51.7%
Hitman 3 27−30
+40%
20−22
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+48.3%
27−30
−48.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+58.8%
17
−58.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+24.2%
33
−24.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+43.3%
30−33
−43.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+37.1%
35−40
−37.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+48.3%
27−30
−48.3%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+44%
24−27
−44%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+54.5%
10−12
−54.5%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+40.9%
21−24
−40.9%

This is how Pro W6600M and RTX A2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Pro W6600M is 32% faster in 1080p
  • Pro W6600M is 31% faster in 1440p
  • Pro W6600M is 34% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Hitman 3, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro W6600M is 172% faster than the RTX A2000 Mobile.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX A2000 Mobile is 23% faster than the Pro W6600M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro W6600M is ahead in 65 tests (90%)
  • RTX A2000 Mobile is ahead in 7 tests (10%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.02 25.52
Recency 8 June 2021 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 95 Watt

The Radeon Pro W6600M is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A2000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6600M is a mobile workstation card while RTX A2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
Radeon Pro W6600M
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
RTX A2000 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 87 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.