Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs Radeon Pro Vega 20

Place in performance ranking	349	289
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	14.39	no data
Architecture	Vega (2017−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Vega Mobile	N19P-Q1
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	15 November 2018 (5 years old)	27 May 2019 (4 years old)
Current price	$360	no data

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	768
Core clock speed	815 MHz	795 / 1230 MHz
Boost clock speed	1283 MHz	1455 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	35 - 40 Watt
Texture fill rate	102.6	75.60

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro Vega 20 and Quadro T1000 Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	no data	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	189.4 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.3	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro Vega 20 13.68

T1000 Max-Q 17.34
+26.8%

Quadro T1000 Max-Q outperforms Radeon Pro Vega 20 by 27% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro Vega 20 5299

T1000 Max-Q 6716
+26.7%

Quadro T1000 Max-Q outperforms Radeon Pro Vega 20 by 27% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	61 −23%	75−80 +23%
4K	41 −22%	50−55 +22%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

21−24

−28.6%

27−30
+28.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −24.1%	35−40 +24.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −30.4%	30−33 +30.4%
Battlefield 5	74 +25.4%	55−60 −25.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −28.6%	45−50 +28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −28.6%	27−30 +28.6%
Far Cry 5	40 −12.5%	45−50 +12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −27%	45−50 +27%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −25%	60−65 +25%
Hitman 3	35−40 −32.4%	45−50 +32.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −27.6%	35−40 +27.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −26.1%	27−30 +26.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	47 +27%	35−40 −27%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 −26.9%	30−35 +26.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −24.1%	35−40 +24.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −30.4%	30−33 +30.4%
Battlefield 5	63 +6.8%	55−60 −6.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −28.6%	45−50 +28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −28.6%	27−30 +28.6%
Far Cry 5	37 −21.6%	45−50 +21.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −27%	45−50 +27%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −25%	60−65 +25%
Hitman 3	35−40 −32.4%	45−50 +32.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −27.6%	35−40 +27.6%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −28.6%	27−30 +28.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −26.1%	27−30 +26.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	38 +2.7%	35−40 −2.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50 +35.1%	35−40 −35.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 −26.9%	30−35 +26.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −24.1%	35−40 +24.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −30.4%	30−33 +30.4%
Battlefield 5	60 +1.7%	55−60 −1.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −28.6%	27−30 +28.6%
Far Cry 5	37 −21.6%	45−50 +21.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −27%	45−50 +27%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −25%	60−65 +25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	31 −19.4%	35−40 +19.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 −26.9%	30−35 +26.9%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 −30%	24−27 +30%
Hitman 3	21−24 −28.6%	27−30 +28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −21.1%	21−24 +21.1%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −30%	12−14 +30%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −29.4%	21−24 +29.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 −50%	14−16 +50%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −35.7%	35−40 +35.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −31.8%	27−30 +31.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −32%	30−35 +32%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −34.6%	35−40 +34.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −37.5%	10−12 +37.5%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%
Hitman 3	12−14 −23.1%	16−18 +23.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −37.5%	10−12 +37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −41.7%	16−18 +41.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Battlefield 5	14−16 −35.7%	18−20 +35.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −27.3%	14−16 +27.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −21.4%	16−18 +21.4%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −26.3%	24−27 +26.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%

This is how Pro Vega 20 and T1000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

T1000 Max-Q is 23% faster than Pro Vega 20

4K resolution:

T1000 Max-Q is 22% faster than Pro Vega 20

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro Vega 20 is 35.1% faster than the T1000 Max-Q.
in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T1000 Max-Q is 50% faster than the Pro Vega 20.

All in all, in popular games: