NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

Pro Vega 20
13.67

Quadro T2000 Max-Q outperforms Radeon Pro Vega 20 by 31% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking348285
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money14.41no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2021)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameVega MobileN19P-Q3 MAX-Q
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date15 November 2018 (5 years old)27 May 2019 (4 years old)
Current price$360 no data
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12801024
Core clock speed815 MHz930 / 1200 MHz
Boost clock speed1283 MHz1500 / 1620 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt35 - 40 Watt
Texture fill rate102.6103.7

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro Vega 20 and Quadro T2000 Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1480 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth189.4 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDAno data7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro Vega 20 13.67
T2000 Max-Q 17.87
+30.7%

Quadro T2000 Max-Q outperforms Radeon Pro Vega 20 by 31% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro Vega 20 5299
T2000 Max-Q 6926
+30.7%

Quadro T2000 Max-Q outperforms Radeon Pro Vega 20 by 31% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Pro Vega 20 33590
T2000 Max-Q 39269
+16.9%

Quadro T2000 Max-Q outperforms Radeon Pro Vega 20 by 17% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Pro Vega 20 12289
+7.2%
T2000 Max-Q 11461

Radeon Pro Vega 20 outperforms Quadro T2000 Max-Q by 7% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Pro Vega 20 9044
+9.5%
T2000 Max-Q 8262

Radeon Pro Vega 20 outperforms Quadro T2000 Max-Q by 9% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Pro Vega 20 62318
+51.6%
T2000 Max-Q 41106

Radeon Pro Vega 20 outperforms Quadro T2000 Max-Q by 52% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

Pro Vega 20 278586
+270%
T2000 Max-Q 75193

Radeon Pro Vega 20 outperforms Quadro T2000 Max-Q by 270% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD61
+5.2%
58
−5.2%
1440p18−20
−44.4%
26
+44.4%
4K41
+7.9%
38
−7.9%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−33.3%
27−30
+33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−82.8%
53
+82.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−34.8%
30−35
+34.8%
Battlefield 5 74
+23.3%
60−65
−23.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−31.4%
45−50
+31.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−33.3%
27−30
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 40
−17.5%
45−50
+17.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−56.8%
58
+56.8%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−29.2%
60−65
+29.2%
Hitman 3 35−40
−37.8%
50−55
+37.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−31%
35−40
+31%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 47
−19.1%
56
+19.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−30.8%
30−35
+30.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−55.2%
45
+55.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−34.8%
30−35
+34.8%
Battlefield 5 63
+5%
60−65
−5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−31.4%
45−50
+31.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−33.3%
27−30
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 37
−27%
45−50
+27%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−48.6%
55
+48.6%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−29.2%
60−65
+29.2%
Hitman 3 35−40
−37.8%
50−55
+37.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−31%
35−40
+31%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−57.1%
33
+57.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 38
−18.4%
45
+18.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
−26%
63
+26%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−30.8%
30−35
+30.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+16%
25
−16%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−34.8%
30−35
+34.8%
Battlefield 5 60
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−33.3%
27−30
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 37
−27%
45−50
+27%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−35.1%
50
+35.1%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−29.2%
60−65
+29.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31
−6.5%
33
+6.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−30.8%
30−35
+30.8%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−35%
27−30
+35%
Hitman 3 21−24
−33.3%
27−30
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−41.7%
16−18
+41.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−30%
12−14
+30%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−35.3%
21−24
+35.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−35.7%
18−20
+35.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−39.3%
35−40
+39.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−36.4%
30−33
+36.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−36%
30−35
+36%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−38.5%
35−40
+38.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−35.7%
18−20
+35.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−44.4%
12−14
+44.4%
Hitman 3 12−14
−30.8%
16−18
+30.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−42.9%
20−22
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−21.4%
16−18
+21.4%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−38.9%
24−27
+38.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%

This is how Pro Vega 20 and T2000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • Pro Vega 20 is 5.2% faster than T2000 Max-Q

1440p resolution:

  • T2000 Max-Q is 44.4% faster than Pro Vega 20

4K resolution:

  • Pro Vega 20 is 7.9% faster than T2000 Max-Q

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Pro Vega 20 is 23.3% faster than the T2000 Max-Q.
  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the T2000 Max-Q is 82.8% faster than the Pro Vega 20.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro Vega 20 is ahead in 3 tests (4%)
  • T2000 Max-Q is ahead in 64 tests (94%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 13.67 17.87
Recency 15 November 2018 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 35 Watt

The Quadro T2000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro Vega 20 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
Radeon Pro Vega 20
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Quadro T2000 Max-Q

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 83 votes

Rate AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 51 vote

Rate NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.