Quadro T600 Mobile vs Radeon Pro 5300M
Aggregated performance score
Quadro T600 Mobile outperforms Radeon Pro 5300M by 6% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 319 | 304 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | 3.65 | no data |
| Architecture | Navi / RDNA (2019−2020) | Turing (2018−2021) |
| GPU code name | Navi 14 | TU117 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 13 November 2019 (4 years old) | 12 April 2021 (3 years old) |
| Current price | $2068 | no data |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1280 | 896 |
| Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 6,400 million | 4,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 40 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 100.0 | 74.76 |
Size and compatibility
Information on Radeon Pro 5300M and Quadro T600 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 10000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2 |
| CUDA | no data | 7.5 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 45−50
−13.3%
| 51
+13.3%
|
Performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
−8.3%
|
24−27
+8.3%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 30−35
−6.3%
|
30−35
+6.3%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 24−27
−7.7%
|
27−30
+7.7%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 50−55
−5.7%
|
55−60
+5.7%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 40−45
−5%
|
40−45
+5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
−8.3%
|
24−27
+8.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 40−45
−32.5%
|
53
+32.5%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 40−45
−7.1%
|
45−50
+7.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
−5.6%
|
55−60
+5.6%
|
| Hitman 3 | 40−45
−7%
|
45−50
+7%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 30−35
−6.1%
|
35−40
+6.1%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 24−27
−3.8%
|
27−30
+3.8%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 30−35
−60.6%
|
53
+60.6%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 27−30
−6.9%
|
30−35
+6.9%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 30−35
−6.3%
|
30−35
+6.3%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 24−27
−7.7%
|
27−30
+7.7%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 50−55
−5.7%
|
55−60
+5.7%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 40−45
−5%
|
40−45
+5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
−8.3%
|
24−27
+8.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 40−45
−22.5%
|
49
+22.5%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 40−45
−7.1%
|
45−50
+7.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
−5.6%
|
55−60
+5.6%
|
| Hitman 3 | 40−45
−7%
|
45−50
+7%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 30−35
−6.1%
|
35−40
+6.1%
|
| Metro Exodus | 24−27
−8.3%
|
24−27
+8.3%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 24−27
−3.8%
|
27−30
+3.8%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 30−35
−18.2%
|
39
+18.2%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35
−57.6%
|
52
+57.6%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 27−30
−6.9%
|
30−35
+6.9%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 30−35
−6.3%
|
30−35
+6.3%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 24−27
−7.7%
|
27−30
+7.7%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 50−55
−5.7%
|
55−60
+5.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
−8.3%
|
24−27
+8.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 40−45
−12.5%
|
45
+12.5%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 40−45
−7.1%
|
45−50
+7.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
−5.6%
|
55−60
+5.6%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35
+17.9%
|
28
−17.9%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 27−30
−6.9%
|
30−35
+6.9%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 21−24
−4.3%
|
24−27
+4.3%
|
| Hitman 3 | 24−27
−8.3%
|
24−27
+8.3%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 21−24
−4.8%
|
21−24
+4.8%
|
| Metro Exodus | 14−16
−7.1%
|
14−16
+7.1%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−12
−9.1%
|
12−14
+9.1%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 20−22
−5%
|
21−24
+5%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 16−18
−6.3%
|
16−18
+6.3%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 12−14
−7.7%
|
14−16
+7.7%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 30−35
−6.1%
|
35−40
+6.1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
−12.5%
|
9−10
+12.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24−27
−8%
|
27−30
+8%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 27−30
−6.9%
|
30−35
+6.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
−6.5%
|
30−35
+6.5%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 10−11
−10%
|
10−12
+10%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
| Hitman 3 | 14−16
−7.1%
|
14−16
+7.1%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 8−9
−12.5%
|
9−10
+12.5%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 8−9
−12.5%
|
9−10
+12.5%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9−10
−11.1%
|
10−11
+11.1%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 9−10
−11.1%
|
10−11
+11.1%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 7−8
−14.3%
|
8−9
+14.3%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 16−18
−12.5%
|
18−20
+12.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
−8.3%
|
12−14
+8.3%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
−9.5%
|
21−24
+9.5%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 6−7
−16.7%
|
7−8
+16.7%
|
This is how Pro 5300M and T600 Mobile compete in popular games:
1080p resolution:
- T600 Mobile is 13.3% faster than Pro 5300M
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 5300M is 17.9% faster than the T600 Mobile.
- in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the T600 Mobile is 60.6% faster than the Pro 5300M.
All in all, in popular games:
- Pro 5300M is ahead in 1 test (1%)
- T600 Mobile is ahead in 63 tests (94%)
- there's a draw in 3 tests (4%)
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 15.48 | 16.36 |
| Recency | 13 November 2019 | 12 April 2021 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 40 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro 5300M and Quadro T600 Mobile.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
