Quadro T600 Mobile vs Radeon Pro 5600M

Radeon Pro 5300M Radeon Pro 5500M Radeon Pro 5600M
VS
Quadro T400 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 5600M and Quadro T600 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Pro 5600M
2020
8 GB HBM2, 50 Watt
23.46
+30.9%

Pro 5600M outperforms T600 Mobile by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Pro 5600M Pro 5600M
T600 Mobile Quadro T600

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking240311
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency32.9531.46
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 12TU117
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date15 June 2020 (4 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560896
Core clock speed1000 MHz780 MHz
Boost clock speed1030 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate164.878.96
Floating-point processing power5.274 TFLOPS2.527 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs16056

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed770 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth394.2 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro 5600M 23.46
+30.9%
T600 Mobile 17.92

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 5600M 9232
+30.9%
T600 Mobile 7053

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD65−70
+27.5%
51
−27.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 60−65
+35.6%
45−50
−35.6%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+37.1%
35−40
−37.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 60−65
+35.6%
45−50
−35.6%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+23.3%
70−75
−23.3%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+37.1%
35−40
−37.1%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+43.4%
53
−43.4%
Fortnite 110−120
+21.5%
90−95
−21.5%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+26.8%
70−75
−26.8%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+33.3%
45−50
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+35.9%
60−65
−35.9%
Valorant 150−160
+17.9%
130−140
−17.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 60−65
+35.6%
45−50
−35.6%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+23.3%
70−75
−23.3%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+15.2%
210−220
−15.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+37.1%
35−40
−37.1%
Dota 2 110−120
+1.7%
116
−1.7%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+55.1%
49
−55.1%
Fortnite 110−120
+21.5%
90−95
−21.5%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+26.8%
70−75
−26.8%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+33.3%
45−50
−33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
+31.7%
63
−31.7%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+36.1%
35−40
−36.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+35.9%
60−65
−35.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+26.9%
52
−26.9%
Valorant 150−160
+17.9%
130−140
−17.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+23.3%
70−75
−23.3%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+37.1%
35−40
−37.1%
Dota 2 110−120
+10.3%
107
−10.3%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+68.9%
45
−68.9%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+26.8%
70−75
−26.8%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+42.2%
45−50
−42.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+35.9%
60−65
−35.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+136%
28
−136%
Valorant 150−160
+31.7%
120−130
−31.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+21.5%
90−95
−21.5%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+27%
120−130
−27%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+37.9%
27−30
−37.9%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+36.4%
21−24
−36.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+34.6%
130−140
−34.6%
Valorant 190−200
+17.9%
160−170
−17.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+28.6%
45−50
−28.6%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+34.2%
35−40
−34.2%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+34.9%
40−45
−34.9%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+35.9%
35−40
−35.9%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+35.5%
30−35
−35.5%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+46.2%
12−14
−46.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Valorant 130−140
+35.4%
95−100
−35.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+30.8%
24−27
−30.8%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Dota 2 75−80
+25%
60−65
−25%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+31.6%
18−20
−31.6%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+35.3%
16−18
−35.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%

1440p
High Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

This is how Pro 5600M and T600 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Pro 5600M is 27% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 5600M is 136% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro 5600M is ahead in 44 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 23.46 17.92
Recency 15 June 2020 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 40 Watt

Pro 5600M has a 30.9% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

T600 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, and 25% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 5600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T600 Mobile in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M
NVIDIA Quadro T600 Mobile
Quadro T600
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro 5600M Radeon Pro 5600M
vs
P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
T600 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile
vs
M5000M Quadro M5000M
Pro 5600M Radeon Pro 5600M
vs
RTX A1000 Mobile RTX A1000 Mobile
RTX A4 Mobile RTX A4 Mobile
vs
RX 5600M 5600M
Tesla PG500-216 NVIDIA PG500 216
vs
Pro Vega II Vega II
A16 PCIe A16 PCIe
vs
RX 6800 XT 6800 XT
RX 6950 XT AMD RX 6950 XT
vs
A40 PCIe PCIe
RX 6950 XT AMD RX 6950 XT
vs
A10G
RX 6750 XT AMD RX 6750 XT
vs
RTX A4000 Mobile A4000 Mobile
RTX A5000 Mobile RTX A5000 Mobile
vs
R5 (Bristol Ridge) (Bristol Ridge)
RTX A5000 Mobile RTX A5000 Mobile
vs
RX 6600M 6600M
RX 6650M AMD RX 6650M
vs
RTX A5000 Mobile A5000 Mobile
T1000 T1000
vs
R9 370 370

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2 79 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 35 votes

Rate Quadro T600 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 5600M or Quadro T600 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.