Quadro T500 Mobile vs Radeon Pro 5300M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon Pro 5300M and Quadro T500 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Pro 5300M outperforms T500 Mobile by an impressive 76% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 344 | 486 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | Navi / RDNA (2019−2020) | Turing (2018−2022) |
GPU code name | Navi 14 | TU117 |
Market segment | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 13 November 2019 (4 years ago) | 27 May 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1280 | 896 |
Core clock speed | no data | 1365 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1695 MHz |
Number of transistors | 6,400 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 25 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 100.0 | 94.92 |
Floating-point performance | 3.2 gflops | 3.037 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5, GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 10000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2 |
CUDA | - | 7.5 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 60−65
+66.7%
| 36
−66.7%
|
1440p | 24−27
+60%
| 15
−60%
|
4K | 27−30
+58.8%
| 17
−58.8%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
+71.4%
|
14−16
−71.4%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 35−40
+59.1%
|
21−24
−59.1%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 24−27
+92.3%
|
12−14
−92.3%
|
Battlefield 5 | 50−55
+85.2%
|
27−30
−85.2%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 30−35
+72.2%
|
18−20
−72.2%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
+71.4%
|
14−16
−71.4%
|
Far Cry 5 | 35−40
+20%
|
30
−20%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 40−45
+68%
|
24−27
−68%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 100−105
+66.7%
|
60−65
−66.7%
|
Hitman 3 | 27−30
+70.6%
|
16−18
−70.6%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 75−80
+56%
|
50−55
−56%
|
Metro Exodus | 50−55
+76.7%
|
30−33
−76.7%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 40−45
+68%
|
24−27
−68%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 50−55
+66.7%
|
30−33
−66.7%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 75−80
+31.7%
|
60−65
−31.7%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 35−40
+59.1%
|
21−24
−59.1%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 24−27
+92.3%
|
12−14
−92.3%
|
Battlefield 5 | 50−55
+85.2%
|
27−30
−85.2%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 30−35
+72.2%
|
18−20
−72.2%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
+71.4%
|
14−16
−71.4%
|
Far Cry 5 | 35−40
+28.6%
|
28
−28.6%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 40−45
+68%
|
24−27
−68%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 100−105
+66.7%
|
60−65
−66.7%
|
Hitman 3 | 27−30
+70.6%
|
16−18
−70.6%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 75−80
+56%
|
50−55
−56%
|
Metro Exodus | 50−55
+89.3%
|
27−30
−89.3%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 40−45
+68%
|
24−27
−68%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 50−55
+66.7%
|
30−33
−66.7%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 35−40
+32.1%
|
28
−32.1%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 75−80
+31.7%
|
60−65
−31.7%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 35−40
+59.1%
|
21−24
−59.1%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 24−27
+92.3%
|
12−14
−92.3%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 30−35
+93.8%
|
16−18
−93.8%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
+71.4%
|
14−16
−71.4%
|
Far Cry 5 | 35−40
+33.3%
|
27
−33.3%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 100−105
+66.7%
|
60−65
−66.7%
|
Hitman 3 | 27−30
+81.3%
|
16−18
−81.3%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 75−80
+95%
|
40−45
−95%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 50−55
+85.2%
|
27−30
−85.2%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 35−40
+94.7%
|
19
−94.7%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 75−80
+31.7%
|
60−65
−31.7%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 40−45
+100%
|
21−24
−100%
|
1440p
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 30−33
+87.5%
|
16−18
−87.5%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 24−27
+100%
|
12−14
−100%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 14−16
+66.7%
|
9−10
−66.7%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 12−14
+160%
|
5−6
−160%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 16−18
+88.9%
|
9−10
−88.9%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+100%
|
4−5
−100%
|
Far Cry 5 | 18−20
+80%
|
10−11
−80%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 80−85
+113%
|
35−40
−113%
|
Hitman 3 | 18−20
+80%
|
10−11
−80%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 30−35
+93.8%
|
16−18
−93.8%
|
Metro Exodus | 27−30
+92.9%
|
14−16
−92.9%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 27−30
+100%
|
14−16
−100%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
+77.8%
|
9−10
−77.8%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 95−100
+66.7%
|
55−60
−66.7%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 24−27
+78.6%
|
14−16
−78.6%
|
4K
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 14−16
+87.5%
|
8−9
−87.5%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 10−12
+83.3%
|
6−7
−83.3%
|
Hitman 3 | 10−12
+120%
|
5−6
−120%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 75−80
+117%
|
35−40
−117%
|
Metro Exodus | 14−16
+114%
|
7−8
−114%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+150%
|
6−7
−150%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 9−10
+80%
|
5−6
−80%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 7−8
+75%
|
4−5
−75%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 8−9
+100%
|
4−5
−100%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
Far Cry 5 | 8−9
+60%
|
5−6
−60%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+90.9%
|
10−12
−90.9%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 14−16
+87.5%
|
8−9
−87.5%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 6−7
+100%
|
3−4
−100%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14−16
+100%
|
7−8
−100%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
This is how Pro 5300M and T500 Mobile compete in popular games:
- Pro 5300M is 67% faster in 1080p
- Pro 5300M is 60% faster in 1440p
- Pro 5300M is 59% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 5300M is 200% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Pro 5300M is ahead in 52 tests (76%)
- there's a draw in 16 tests (24%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 15.44 | 8.76 |
Recency | 13 November 2019 | 27 May 2019 |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 25 Watt |
Pro 5300M has a 76.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 months, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.
T500 Mobile, on the other hand, has 160% lower power consumption.
The Radeon Pro 5300M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T500 Mobile in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.