NVIDIA Quadro T600 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro 5500M

Price now 1950$

Games supported 83%

Price now no data

Games supported 83%

Questions and comments

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating	233	235
Value for money	6.89	no data
Architecture	Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Navi 14	TU117
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	13 November 2019 (3 years old)	12 April 2021 (1 year old)
Current price	$1950	no data

Value for money

To calculate the index we compare the characteristics of graphics cards against their prices.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	896
Boost clock speed	1300 MHz	1400 MHz
Number of transistors	6,400 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	12 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)	50 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	139.2	74.76

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Radeon Pro 5500M and Quadro T600 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	no data	7.5

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 5500M 17.34
+2.1%

T600 Mobile 16.99

3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
3DMark Fire Strike Score
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 16%

Pro 5500M 14725
+40.3%

T600 Mobile 10498

Radeon Pro 5500M outperforms Quadro T600 Mobile by 40% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pro 5500M 65776
+21.9%

T600 Mobile 53941

Radeon Pro 5500M outperforms Quadro T600 Mobile by 22% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pro 5500M 9196
+23%

T600 Mobile 7475

Radeon Pro 5500M outperforms Quadro T600 Mobile by 23% in 3DMark Fire Strike Score.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Pro 5500M 10399
+31.2%

T600 Mobile 7928

Radeon Pro 5500M outperforms Quadro T600 Mobile by 31% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	57 +11.8%	51 −11.8%
1440p	49	no data
4K	31	no data

Popular games

Full HD
Low Preset
Full HD
Medium Preset
Full HD
High Preset
Full HD
Ultra Preset
1440p
High Preset
1440p
Ultra Preset
4K
High Preset
4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

27−30

+0%

27−30

+0%

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +2.9%	30−35 −2.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 +3.6%	27−30 −3.6%
Battlefield 5	76 +35.7%	55−60 −35.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +2.3%	40−45 −2.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −17.8%	53 +17.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	67 +48.9%	45−50 −48.9%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +1.7%	55−60 −1.7%
Hitman 3	81 +72.3%	45−50 −72.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +2.8%	35−40 −2.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55 +96.4%	27−30 −96.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	58 +9.4%	53 −9.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +2.9%	30−35 −2.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 +3.6%	27−30 −3.6%
Battlefield 5	62 +10.7%	55−60 −10.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	17 −159%	40−45 +159%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −8.9%	49 +8.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	64 +42.2%	45−50 −42.2%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +1.7%	55−60 −1.7%
Hitman 3	64 +36.2%	45−50 −36.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +2.8%	35−40 −2.8%
Metro Exodus	37 +42.3%	24−27 −42.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	28 +0%	27−30 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50 +28.2%	39 −28.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	68 +30.8%	52 −30.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +2.9%	30−35 −2.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 +3.6%	27−30 −3.6%
Battlefield 5	59 +5.4%	55−60 −5.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Far Cry 5	55 +22.2%	45 −22.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	57 +26.7%	45−50 −26.7%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +1.7%	55−60 −1.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	39 +39.3%	28 −39.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Hitman 3	27−30 +3.7%	27−30 −3.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Metro Exodus	22 +37.5%	16−18 −37.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30 +42.9%	21−24 −42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Battlefield 5	47 +27%	35−40 −27%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Far Cry 5	40 +42.9%	27−30 −42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	41 +32.3%	30−35 −32.3%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +2.9%	30−35 −2.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Hitman 3	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Metro Exodus	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	13 +30%	10−11 −30%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Battlefield 5	14 −35.7%	18−20 +35.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry 5	20 +42.9%	14−16 −42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	21 +31.3%	16−18 −31.3%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance rating	17.34	16.99
Recency	13 November 2019	12 April 2021
Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	896
Memory bandwidth	192	80
Chip lithography	7 nm	12 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)	50 Watt	40 Watt

Technical City couldn't decide between

Radeon Pro 5500M

and

Quadro T600 Mobile

The differences in performance seem too small.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Radeon Pro 5500M

Quadro T600 Mobile

Competitors of Radeon Pro 5500M by NVIDIA

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon Pro 5500M from NVIDIA is Quadro T2000 Max-Q, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 1 position in our rating.

Quadro T2000 Max-Q

Compare

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon Pro 5500M:

Quadro T1200 Mobile 112.34

Quadro M5000M 102.88

Quadro T2000 Max-Q 100.46

Radeon Pro 5500M 100

Quadro T1000 Max-Q 98.27

Quadro T600 Mobile 97.98

Quadro T1000 Mobile 95.91