RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs Radeon 780M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 780M with RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 780M
2023
15 Watt
18.31

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation outperforms 780M by a whopping 192% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking30248
Place by popularity48not in top-100
Power efficiency83.9552.55
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameHawx PointAD104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 December 2023 (1 year ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7686144
Core clock speed800 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speed2700 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors25,390 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate129.6299.5
Floating-point processing power8.294 TFLOPS19.17 TFLOPS
ROPs3280
TMUs48192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Cores1248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared20 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared160 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data280.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 780M 18.31
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 53.49
+192%

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 780M 7051
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 20600
+192%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
−178%
100−110
+178%
1440p20
−175%
55−60
+175%
4K13
−169%
35−40
+169%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 39
−182%
110−120
+182%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−168%
110−120
+168%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
−183%
85−90
+183%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−183%
170−180
+183%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−170%
100−105
+170%
Cyberpunk 2077 31
−190%
90−95
+190%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−179%
120−130
+179%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−186%
140−150
+186%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−161%
300−310
+161%
Hitman 3 35−40
−186%
100−105
+186%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
−189%
260−270
+189%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−186%
180−190
+186%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−186%
140−150
+186%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
−183%
170−180
+183%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−187%
250−260
+187%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−168%
110−120
+168%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
−183%
85−90
+183%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−183%
170−180
+183%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−170%
100−105
+170%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
−192%
70−75
+192%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−179%
120−130
+179%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−186%
140−150
+186%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−161%
300−310
+161%
Hitman 3 35−40
−186%
100−105
+186%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
−189%
260−270
+189%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−186%
180−190
+186%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−186%
140−150
+186%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 54
−178%
150−160
+178%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−186%
120−130
+186%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−187%
250−260
+187%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−168%
110−120
+168%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
−183%
85−90
+183%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−170%
100−105
+170%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
−183%
65−70
+183%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−179%
120−130
+179%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−161%
300−310
+161%
Hitman 3 35−40
−186%
100−105
+186%
Horizon Zero Dawn 53
−183%
150−160
+183%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 46
−183%
130−140
+183%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
−176%
80−85
+176%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18
−178%
50−55
+178%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−186%
140−150
+186%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−186%
100−105
+186%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−186%
80−85
+186%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−189%
55−60
+189%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−181%
45−50
+181%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−175%
55−60
+175%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−186%
60−65
+186%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
−190%
290−300
+190%
Hitman 3 21−24
−173%
60−65
+173%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−170%
100−105
+170%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−179%
95−100
+179%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 32
−181%
90−95
+181%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
−175%
55−60
+175%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
−173%
300−310
+173%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
−183%
85−90
+183%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Hitman 3 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
−187%
270−280
+187%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−189%
55−60
+189%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
−167%
40−45
+167%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−180%
70−75
+180%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
−165%
45−50
+165%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−181%
45−50
+181%

This is how Radeon 780M and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 178% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 175% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 169% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.31 53.49
Recency 6 December 2023 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 70 Watt

Radeon 780M has an age advantage of 8 months, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 366.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 192.1% higher aggregate performance score.

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 780M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 780M is a notebook card while RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2
1572 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3
49 votes

Rate RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.