Radeon 780M: specs and benchmarks
Aggregated performance score
It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at 18.36% of a leader's which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
Summary
AMD started Radeon 780M sales 5 January 2023. This is a laptop graphics card based on a RDNA 3 architecture and made with 4 nm manufacturing process. It is primarily aimed at gamers.
Compatibility-wise, this is card attached via PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. Power consumption is at 54 Watt (35 - 54 Watt TGP).
General info
Some basic facts about Radeon 780M: architecture, market segment, release date etc.
| Place in performance ranking | 280 | |
| Place by popularity | 87 | |
| Architecture | RDNA 3 | |
| GPU code name | Phoenix | |
| Market segment | Laptop | |
| Release date | 5 January 2023 (1 year old) |
Technical specs
Radeon 780M's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon 780M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | of 20480 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT) |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) |
| Boost clock speed | 3000 MHz | of 3599 (Radeon RX 7990 XTX) |
| Number of transistors | 25,390 million | of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt (35 - 54 Watt TGP) | of 2400 (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem) |
| Texture fill rate | 139.2 | of 969.9 (H100 SXM5 96 GB) |
Size and compatibility
Information on Radeon 780M's compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed on Radeon 780M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.
| Memory type | System Shared | |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | of 192 (Radeon Instinct MI300X) |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | of 23000 (GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER) |
| Shared memory | + |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon 780M. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent |
API support
APIs supported by Radeon 780M, sometimes including their particular versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| Vulkan | 1.3 |
Benchmark performance
Synthetic benchmark performance of Radeon 780M. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 8%
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
Benchmark coverage: 3%
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
Benchmark coverage: 3%
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
Benchmark coverage: 3%
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
Benchmark coverage: 3%
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
Benchmark coverage: 3%
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 medical-01
Benchmark coverage: 3%
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
Benchmark coverage: 3%
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
Benchmark coverage: 3%
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
Benchmark coverage: 2%
Send your test results of Radeon 780M.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good Radeon 780M is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 37 | |
| 1440p | 21 | |
| 4K | 12 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 39 |
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 35−40 | |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 30−35 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65 | |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 45−50 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 31 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 44 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 44 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65 | |
| Hitman 3 | 50−55 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 48 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30−33 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 42 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 41 |
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 35−40 | |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 30−35 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65 | |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 45−50 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 41 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 41 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65 | |
| Hitman 3 | 50−55 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 40 | |
| Metro Exodus | 27 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30−33 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 35 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 46 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 33 |
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 35−40 | |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 30−35 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 23 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 38 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 39 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 29 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 18 |
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 27−30 | |
| Hitman 3 | 27−30 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 23 | |
| Metro Exodus | 16−18 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14−16 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 21−24 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 18−20 | |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 16−18 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 27 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 35−40 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 20 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 12−14 |
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 12−14 | |
| Hitman 3 | 16−18 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14 | |
| Metro Exodus | 10−11 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−11 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 12−14 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 15 |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 10−12 | |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 9−10 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 12 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 18−20 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 8−9 |
NVIDIA equivalent
According to our data, the closest NVIDIA alternative to Radeon 780M is GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 1 position in our ranking.
Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon 780M:
Similar GPUs
Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Recommended processors
These processors are most commonly used with Radeon 780M according to our statistics.
