RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs Radeon 780M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking354not rated
Place by popularity43not in top-100
Power efficiency84.06no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code namePhoenixAD104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date31 January 2024 (1 year ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7685120
Core clock speed800 MHz1725 MHz
Boost clock speed2900 MHz2250 MHz
Number of transistors25,390 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate139.2360.0
Floating-point processing power8.909 TFLOPS23.04 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs48160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Cores1240
L0 Cache192 KBno data
L1 Cache256 KB5 MB
L2 Cache2 MB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data432.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 January 2024 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 100 Watt

Radeon 780M has an age advantage of 10 months, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 780M and RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 780M is a desktop graphics card while RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 2243 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3 votes

Rate RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 780M or RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.