Quadro P4200 vs P5000 Mobile
Aggregated performance score
P5000 Mobile outperforms P4200 by 19% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 173 | 196 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | 5.55 | 7.55 |
Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
GPU code name | N17E-Q5 | GP104 |
Market segment | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 11 January 2017 (7 years ago) | 7 May 2018 (5 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,885 | no data |
Current price | $2137 (1.1x MSRP) | $1526 |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Quadro P4200 has 36% better value for money than P5000 Mobile.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 2304 |
Core clock speed | 1164 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1506 MHz | 1480 MHz |
Number of transistors | 7,200 million | 7,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 115 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 202.5 | 237.2 |
Floating-point performance | 6,197 gflops | no data |
Size and compatibility
Information on Quadro P5000 Mobile and Quadro P4200 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | large | large |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6006 MHz | 7132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 192.3 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.4 | no data |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Optimus | + | + |
3D Stereo | + | no data |
Mosaic | + | no data |
nView Display Management | + | no data |
Optimus | + | no data |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 6.1 | 6.1 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
P5000 Mobile outperforms P4200 by 19% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
P5000 Mobile outperforms P4200 by 9% in Passmark.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 29.85 | 25.04 |
Recency | 11 January 2017 | 7 May 2018 |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 115 Watt |
The Quadro P5000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P4200 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.