NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs P3200
Comparison of Quadro M4000M and Quadro P3200 architecture, market type and release date.
Quadro M4000M and Quadro P3200's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro M4000M and Quadro P3200's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
708 - 1202 MHz
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Quadro M4000M and Quadro P3200 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
Parameters of memory installed on Quadro M4000M and Quadro P3200: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro M4000M and Quadro P3200.
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro M4000M and Quadro P3200. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Vision Pro
nView Display Management
APIs supported by Quadro M4000M and Quadro P3200, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro M4000M and Quadro P3200. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
M4000M 27.62 +0.8%
Quadro P3200 27.39
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Quadro P3200 82507 +67.7%
3DMark Fire Strike Score
Quadro P3200 11058 +59.4%
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Quadro P3200 12555 +62.6%
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
Quadro P3200 16619 +62%
M4000M 6253 +2.8%
Quadro P3200 6084
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro M4000M and Quadro P3200. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
Let's see how good Quadro M4000M and Quadro P3200 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
0.8% faster in synthetic tests
Wider memory bus (256 vs 128 bit)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Much newer (27 February 2017 vs 18 August 2015)
More pipelines (1792 vs 1)
Finer manufacturing process technology (16 vs 28 nm)
So, Quadro M4000M or P3200?
Technical City couldn't decide between NVIDIA Quadro M4000M and NVIDIA Quadro P3200. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro M4000M and Quadro P3200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.