Quadro M4000M: specs and benchmarks
Aggregate performance score
Quadro M4000M provides acceptable gaming and benchmark performance at 13.86% of a leader's which is RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell.
Contents
Summary
NVIDIA started Quadro M4000M sales 18 August 2015. This is a Maxwell 2.0 architecture notebook card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. 4 GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 1.25 GHz are supplied, and together with 256 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 160 GB/s.
Compatibility-wise, this is a graphics card attached via PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. Power consumption is at 100 Watt.
Primary details
Some basic facts about Quadro M4000M: architecture, market segment, release date etc.
| Place in the ranking | 385 | |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | |
| Power efficiency | 11.15 | of 100.00 (Radeon 890M) |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) | |
| GPU code name | GM204 | |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | |
| Release date | 18 August 2015 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Quadro M4000M's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro M4000M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1,280 | of 960 (GeForce GTX 660) |
| Core clock speed | 975 MHz | of 980 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) |
| Boost clock speed | 1013 MHz | of 1000 (HD Graphics (Haswell)) |
| Number of transistors | 5,200 million | of 100,000 million (Data Center GPU Max 1100) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | of 0.003 MB (Arc Graphics 140V) |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | of 235 (FirePro S9150) |
| Texture fill rate | 78.00 | of 1,968 (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell) |
| Floating-point processing power | 2.496 TFLOPS | of 126 (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell) |
| ROPs | 64 | of 512 (Moore Threads MTT S4000) |
| TMUs | 80 | of 896 (Data Center GPU Max 1350) |
| L1 Cache | 480 KB | of 64 MB (Data Center GPU Max 1550) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | of 408 MB (Data Center GPU Max 1350) |
Form factor & compatibility
This section provides details about the physical dimensions of Quadro M4000M and its compatibility with other computer components. This information is useful when selecting a computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards, it includes details about the interface and bus (for motherboard compatibility) and additional power connectors (for power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of memory installed on Quadro M4000M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | of 288 GB (Radeon Instinct MI325X) |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | of 384 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) |
| Memory clock speed | 1253 MHz | of 16384000 MB (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | of 983040 MB (GeForce RTX 5080) |
| Shared memory | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro M4000M. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Display Port | 1.2 |
Supported technologies
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro M4000M. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Optimus | + |
API and SDK support
APIs supported by Quadro M4000M, sometimes including their particular versions.
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | of 4.6 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | + | |
| CUDA | 5.2 |
Benchmark performance
Synthetic benchmark performance of Quadro M4000M. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
GeekBench 5 Vulkan
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.
Octane Render OctaneBench
This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 medical-01
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase
SPECviewperf 12 - Maya
This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.
SPECviewperf 12 - Catia
SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks
SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX
SPECviewperf 12 - Creo
SPECviewperf 12 - Medical
SPECviewperf 12 - Energy
Send your test results of Quadro M4000M.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good Quadro M4000M is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 63 | |
| 4K | 20 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 80−85 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35 | |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 27−30 |
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65 | |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 80−85 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 45−50 | |
| Fortnite | 80−85 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65 | |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 45−50 | |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 27−30 | |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 55−60 | |
| Valorant | 120−130 |
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65 | |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 80−85 | |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 190−200 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35 | |
| Dota 2 | 90−95 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 45−50 | |
| Fortnite | 80−85 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65 | |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 45−50 | |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 55−60 | |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 27−30 | |
| Metro Exodus | 30−35 | |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 55−60 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 40−45 | |
| Valorant | 120−130 |
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35 | |
| Dota 2 | 90−95 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 45−50 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65 | |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 27−30 | |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 55−60 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 40−45 | |
| Valorant | 120−130 |
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 80−85 |
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 27−30 | |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 110−120 | |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 24−27 | |
| Metro Exodus | 18−20 | |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 140−150 | |
| Valorant | 150−160 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40 | |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 16−18 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24 |
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 30−35 |
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12 | |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 27−30 | |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 9−10 | |
| Metro Exodus | 10−12 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 20−22 | |
| Valorant | 80−85 |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24 | |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6 | |
| Dota 2 | 50−55 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 16−18 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27 | |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 9−10 | |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16 |
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 14−16 |
AMD equivalent
According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to Quadro M4000M is Radeon Pro 570, which is faster by 3% and higher by 10 positions in our ranking.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro M4000M:
Similar GPUs
Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Recommended processors
These processors are most commonly used with Quadro M4000M according to our statistics.
