NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs T1000 Mobile
Comparison of Quadro M4000M and Quadro T1000 Mobile architecture, market type and release date.
Quadro M4000M and Quadro T1000 Mobile's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro M4000M and Quadro T1000 Mobile's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
78 GTexel / s
69.84 GTexel / s
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Quadro M4000M and Quadro T1000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
Parameters of memory installed on Quadro M4000M and Quadro T1000 Mobile: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
160 GB / s
128.0 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro M4000M and Quadro T1000 Mobile.
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro M4000M and Quadro T1000 Mobile. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Vision Pro
nView Display Management
APIs supported by Quadro M4000M and Quadro T1000 Mobile, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro M4000M and Quadro T1000 Mobile. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
T1000 Mobile 29.06 +35.2%
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
M4000M 49204 +0.5%
T1000 Mobile 48965
3DMark Fire Strike Score
M4000M 6937 +1.8%
T1000 Mobile 6812
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
M4000M 7723 +2.2%
T1000 Mobile 7558
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
T1000 Mobile 10407 +1.4%
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro M4000M and Quadro T1000 Mobile. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
Let's see how good Quadro M4000M and Quadro T1000 Mobile are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Wider memory bus (256 vs 128 bit)
Higher memory bandwidth (160 vs 128 GB/s)
Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)
PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)
3D Vision Pro
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
35.2% faster in synthetic tests
Much newer (27 May 2019 vs 2 October 2015)
More pipelines (768 vs 1)
Finer manufacturing process technology (12 vs 28 nm)
Less power hungry (50 vs 100 watts)
So, Quadro M4000M or T1000 Mobile?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro M4000M and Quadro T1000 Mobile, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.