Qualcomm Adreno 685 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
Aggregated performance score
Iris Xe Graphics G7 outperforms Qualcomm Adreno 685 by 298% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 395 | 770 |
| Place by popularity | 16 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.67 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) | no data |
| GPU code name | Tiger Lake Xe | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 15 August 2020 (3 years ago) | 6 December 2018 (5 years ago) |
| Current price | no data | $1429 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 96 | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 7 Watt |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR4 | no data |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 outperforms Qualcomm Adreno 685 by 298% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 outperforms Qualcomm Adreno 685 by 248% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
+633%
|
3−4
−633%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+620%
|
5−6
−620%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 27−30
+133%
|
12−14
−133%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30
+575%
|
4−5
−575%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 27−30
+867%
|
3−4
−867%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+533%
|
6−7
−533%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 21−24
+450%
|
4−5
−450%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 18−20
+200%
|
6−7
−200%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 21−24
+156%
|
9−10
−156%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
+633%
|
3−4
−633%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+620%
|
5−6
−620%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 27−30
+133%
|
12−14
−133%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30
+575%
|
4−5
−575%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 27−30
+867%
|
3−4
−867%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+533%
|
6−7
−533%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 21−24
+450%
|
4−5
−450%
|
| Metro Exodus | 16−18
+300%
|
4−5
−300%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 18−20
+200%
|
6−7
−200%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 21−24
+156%
|
9−10
−156%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+267%
|
6−7
−267%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
+633%
|
3−4
−633%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+620%
|
5−6
−620%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30
+575%
|
4−5
−575%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 27−30
+867%
|
3−4
−867%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+533%
|
6−7
−533%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+267%
|
6−7
−267%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 14−16
+200%
|
5−6
−200%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 16−18
+77.8%
|
9−10
−77.8%
|
| Metro Exodus | 9−10
+800%
|
1−2
−800%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8
+600%
|
1−2
−600%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 14−16
+133%
|
6−7
−133%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| Battlefield 5 | 18−20
+375%
|
4−5
−375%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 16−18
+325%
|
4−5
−325%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 18−20
+350%
|
4−5
−350%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 20−22
+1900%
|
1−2
−1900%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 7−8
+250%
|
2−3
−250%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 9−10
+28.6%
|
7−8
−28.6%
|
| Metro Exodus | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
+300%
|
2−3
−300%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
+125%
|
4−5
−125%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 10−12
+83.3%
|
6−7
−83.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
+367%
|
3−4
−367%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 is 1900% faster than the Qualcomm Adreno 685.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, Iris Xe Graphics G7 surpassed Qualcomm Adreno 685 in all 39 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 10.67 | 2.68 |
| Recency | 15 August 2020 | 6 December 2018 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 7 nm |
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm Adreno 685 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
