Place in the ranking	834
Place by popularity	not in top-100
Power efficiency	24.95	of 100.00 (Radeon 890M)
Market segment	Laptop
Release date	6 December 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Qualcomm Adreno 685's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Qualcomm Adreno 685's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	of 3 nm (Arc Graphics 140V)
Power consumption (TDP)	7 Watt	of 2400 Watt (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of memory installed on Qualcomm Adreno 685: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.

Shared memory

API compatibility

APIs supported by Qualcomm Adreno 685, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX

Benchmark performance

Synthetic benchmark performance of Qualcomm Adreno 685. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Qualcomm Adreno 685 2.44

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Qualcomm Adreno 685 975

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Qualcomm Adreno 685 1927

Gaming performance

Let's see how good Qualcomm Adreno 685 is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7
Counter-Strike 2	10−12
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7
Forza Horizon 4	12−14
Forza Horizon 5	1−2
Metro Exodus	4−5
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11
Valorant	1−2

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7
Counter-Strike 2	10−12
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7
Dota 2	6−7
Far Cry 5	14−16
Fortnite	14−16
Forza Horizon 4	12−14
Forza Horizon 5	1−2
Grand Theft Auto V	6−7
Metro Exodus	4−5
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11
Valorant	1−2
World of Tanks	45−50

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7
Counter-Strike 2	10−12
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7
Dota 2	6−7
Far Cry 5	14−16
Forza Horizon 4	12−14
Forza Horizon 5	1−2
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27
Valorant	1−2

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	1−2
Grand Theft Auto V	1−2
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	18−20
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2
World of Tanks	16−18

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3
Counter-Strike 2	2−3
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5
Far Cry 5	7−8
Forza Horizon 4	1−2
Forza Horizon 5	3−4
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7
Valorant	9−10

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10
Dota 2	16−18
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16