GeForce MX350 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7

Place in performance ranking	393	505
Place by popularity	27	not in top-100
Architecture	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Tiger Lake Xe	N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	15 August 2020 (3 years old)	20 February 2020 (4 years old)

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	640
Core clock speed	no data	1354 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1468 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	29.98

Size and compatibility

Information on Iris Xe Graphics G7 and GeForce MX350 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR4	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	no data	2 GB
Memory bus width	no data	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	56.06 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	no data	+
Quick Sync	+	no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX 12_1	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.4
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	no data	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 10.66
+47.2%

GeForce MX350 7.24

Iris Xe Graphics G7 outperforms GeForce MX350 by 47% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 6710
+8.8%

GeForce MX350 6166

Iris Xe Graphics G7 outperforms GeForce MX350 by 9% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 4820
+10.3%

GeForce MX350 4371

Iris Xe Graphics G7 outperforms GeForce MX350 by 10% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 38040
+53.7%

GeForce MX350 24744

Iris Xe Graphics G7 outperforms GeForce MX350 by 54% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	35−40 +34.6%	26 −34.6%
1440p	35−40 +29.6%	27 −29.6%
4K	35−40 +34.6%	26 −34.6%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +0%	22 +0%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −2.8%	37 +2.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −14.3%	32 +14.3%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +0%	27 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +3.6%	28 −3.6%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +2.7%	37 −2.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +37.5%	16 −37.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 +0%	18 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +0%	23 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +57.1%	14 −57.1%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +20%	30 −20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +40%	20 −40%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +17.4%	23 −17.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +11.5%	26 −11.5%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +46.2%	26 −46.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +83.3%	12 −83.3%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +33.3%	12 −33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 +38.5%	12−14 −38.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +53.3%	15 −53.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −22.7%	27 +22.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +175%	8 −175%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +50%	24 −50%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +28.6%	21 −28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +26.1%	23 −26.1%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +100%	19 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +37.5%	16 −37.5%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +36.4%	10−12 −36.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +23.1%	12−14 −23.1%
Metro Exodus	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Battlefield 5	18−20 +138%	8−9 −138%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +54.5%	10−12 −54.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +80%	10−11 −80%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 +66.7%	12−14 −66.7%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Battlefield 5	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +75%	8−9 −75%

This is how Iris Xe Graphics G7 and GeForce MX350 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

Iris Xe Graphics G7 is 34.6% faster than GeForce MX350

1440p resolution:

Iris Xe Graphics G7 is 29.6% faster than GeForce MX350

4K resolution:

Iris Xe Graphics G7 is 34.6% faster than GeForce MX350

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 is 300% faster than the GeForce MX350.
in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX350 is 22.7% faster than the Iris Xe Graphics G7.

All in all, in popular games: