Radeon 880M vs GeForce RTX 5060
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce RTX 5060 with Radeon 880M, including specs and performance data.
RTX 5060 outperforms 880M by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 264 | 274 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 8.58 | 93.66 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 (2025) | RDNA 3.5 (2024) |
| GPU code name | GB206 | Strix Point |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 2025 (recently) | 15 July 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4608 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 2235 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2520 MHz | 2900 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 34,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 0 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 362.9 | 92.80 |
| Floating-point processing power | 23.22 TFLOPS | 2.97 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48 | 16 |
| TMUs | 144 | 32 |
| Tensor Cores | 144 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | 12 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR7 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 355.0 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | Portable Device Dependent |
| HDMI | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 10.1 | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 35−40
−2.9%
| 36
+2.9%
|
| 1440p | 21−24
−4.8%
| 22
+4.8%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 35−40
−10.5%
|
42
+10.5%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+4.7%
|
60−65
−4.7%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 35−40
+15.2%
|
33
−15.2%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 55−60
+3.7%
|
50−55
−3.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 55−60
+3.6%
|
55−60
−3.6%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 45−50
+2.1%
|
45−50
−2.1%
|
| Valorant | 85−90
+3.7%
|
80−85
−3.7%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+4.7%
|
60−65
−4.7%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 35−40
+46.2%
|
26
−46.2%
|
| Dota 2 | 70−75
+39.6%
|
53
−39.6%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 65−70
+56.8%
|
44
−56.8%
|
| Fortnite | 110−120
+2.8%
|
100−110
−2.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 55−60
+3.7%
|
50−55
−3.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 55−60
+3.6%
|
55−60
−3.6%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 140−150
+2.9%
|
130−140
−2.9%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 45−50
+2.1%
|
45−50
−2.1%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 65−70
+4.7%
|
60−65
−4.7%
|
| Valorant | 85−90
+3.7%
|
80−85
−3.7%
|
| World of Tanks | 230−240
+2.1%
|
230−240
−2.1%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+4.7%
|
60−65
−4.7%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 35−40
+81%
|
21
−81%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 65−70
+1.5%
|
65−70
−1.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 55−60
+3.7%
|
50−55
−3.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 140−150
+2.9%
|
130−140
−2.9%
|
| Valorant | 85−90
+3.7%
|
80−85
−3.7%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 30−35
+54.5%
|
22
−54.5%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 18−20
+5.6%
|
18−20
−5.6%
|
| World of Tanks | 140−150
+3.6%
|
130−140
−3.6%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+4.9%
|
40−45
−4.9%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+63.2%
|
19
−63.2%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 55−60
+5.5%
|
55−60
−5.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 30−35
+6.3%
|
30−35
−6.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 45−50
+4.3%
|
45−50
−4.3%
|
| Valorant | 55−60
+3.8%
|
50−55
−3.8%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 18−20
+5.9%
|
16−18
−5.9%
|
| Dota 2 | 35−40
+2.9%
|
35−40
−2.9%
|
| Metro Exodus | 16−18
+6.7%
|
14−16
−6.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 60−65
+4.9%
|
60−65
−4.9%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+5%
|
20−22
−5%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 18−20
+5.9%
|
16−18
−5.9%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30
+3.8%
|
24−27
−3.8%
|
| Fortnite | 24−27
+4.2%
|
24−27
−4.2%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
+8.3%
|
24−27
−8.3%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Forza Horizon 4 | 74
+0%
|
74
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Forza Horizon 4 | 63
+0%
|
63
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 52
+0%
|
52
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Forza Horizon 4 | 53
+0%
|
53
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
This is how RTX 5060 and Radeon 880M compete in popular games:
- Radeon 880M is 3% faster in 1080p
- Radeon 880M is 5% faster in 1440p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 5060 is 81% faster.
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Radeon 880M is 11% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RTX 5060 is ahead in 42 tests (76%)
- Radeon 880M is ahead in 1 test (2%)
- there's a draw in 12 tests (22%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 21.14 | 20.37 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 15 Watt |
RTX 5060 has a 3.8% higher aggregate performance score.
Radeon 880M, on the other hand, has 1033.3% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 5060 and Radeon 880M.
Be aware that GeForce RTX 5060 is a desktop card while Radeon 880M is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
