GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB vs Radeon 880M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 880M with GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB, including specs and performance data.

Radeon 880M
2024
15 Watt
19.09

RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB outperforms 880M by a whopping 194% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking31352
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data70.21
Power efficiency91.8222.53
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameStrix PointGB206
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 July 2024 (less than a year ago)16 April 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$429

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7684608
Core clock speed400 MHz2407 MHz
Boost clock speed2900 MHz2572 MHz
Number of transistors34,000 million21,900 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rate139.2370.4
Floating-point processing power4.454 TFLOPS23.7 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs48144
Tensor Coresno data144
Ray Tracing Cores1236

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon 880M 19.09
RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB 56.22
+194%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 880M 7701
RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB 22683
+195%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
−178%
100−110
+178%
1440p22
−173%
60−65
+173%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.29
1440pno data7.15

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 95
−184%
270−280
+184%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−175%
110−120
+175%
Dead Island 2 75−80
−193%
220−230
+193%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−182%
220−230
+182%
Counter-Strike 2 70
−186%
200−210
+186%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−175%
110−120
+175%
Dead Island 2 75−80
−193%
220−230
+193%
Far Cry 5 54
−178%
150−160
+178%
Fortnite 100−105
−190%
290−300
+190%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−186%
220−230
+186%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
−188%
170−180
+188%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−182%
200−210
+182%
Valorant 140−150
−182%
400−450
+182%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−182%
220−230
+182%
Counter-Strike 2 39
−182%
110−120
+182%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
−184%
650−700
+184%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−175%
110−120
+175%
Dead Island 2 75−80
−193%
220−230
+193%
Far Cry 5 49
−186%
140−150
+186%
Fortnite 100−105
−190%
290−300
+190%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−186%
220−230
+186%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
−188%
170−180
+188%
Grand Theft Auto V 54
−178%
150−160
+178%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−175%
110−120
+175%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−182%
200−210
+182%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 53
−183%
150−160
+183%
Valorant 140−150
−182%
400−450
+182%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−182%
220−230
+182%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−175%
110−120
+175%
Dead Island 2 75−80
−193%
220−230
+193%
Far Cry 5 46
−183%
130−140
+183%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−186%
220−230
+186%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−182%
200−210
+182%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
−188%
95−100
+188%
Valorant 140−150
−182%
400−450
+182%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−105
−190%
290−300
+190%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−182%
110−120
+182%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
−194%
400−450
+194%
Grand Theft Auto V 22
−173%
60−65
+173%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−192%
70−75
+192%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−192%
500−550
+192%
Valorant 170−180
−181%
500−550
+181%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−183%
150−160
+183%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
Dead Island 2 30−35
−188%
95−100
+188%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−186%
120−130
+186%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−177%
130−140
+177%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
−183%
85−90
+183%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
−179%
120−130
+179%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−181%
45−50
+181%
Dead Island 2 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−194%
100−105
+194%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−178%
75−80
+178%
Valorant 100−110
−183%
300−310
+183%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−186%
80−85
+186%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−181%
45−50
+181%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Dead Island 2 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−186%
60−65
+186%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−188%
95−100
+188%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−189%
55−60
+189%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
−189%
55−60
+189%

This is how Radeon 880M and RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB is 178% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB is 173% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.09 56.22
Recency 15 July 2024 16 April 2025
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 180 Watt

Radeon 880M has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 1100% lower power consumption.

RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB, on the other hand, has a 194.5% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 9 months.

The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 880M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 880M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 880M
Radeon 880M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 19 votes

Rate Radeon 880M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 614 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 880M or GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.