Radeon 820M vs GeForce RTX 5060
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce RTX 5060 with Radeon 820M, including specs and performance data.
5060 outperforms 820M by a whopping 3745% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 70 | 1056 |
| Place by popularity | 8 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 100.00 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 26.06 | no data |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 (2025) | RDNA 3+ (2024) |
| GPU code name | GB206 | Krackan Point |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 19 May 2025 (less than a year ago) | 2 June 2024 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3840 | 128 |
| Core clock speed | 2280 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2497 MHz | 2900 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 21,900 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 145 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 299.6 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 19.18 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 48 | no data |
| TMUs | 120 | no data |
| Tensor Cores | 120 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30 | no data |
| L1 Cache | 3.8 MB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x8 | no data |
| Length | 241 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR7 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 7500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
| Resizable BAR | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b | no data |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | no data |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | - |
| CUDA | 12.0 | - |
| DLSS | + | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 163
+3975%
| 4−5
−3975%
|
| 1440p | 79
+3850%
| 2−3
−3850%
|
| 4K | 53
+5200%
| 1−2
−5200%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 1.83 | no data |
| 1440p | 3.78 | no data |
| 4K | 5.64 | no data |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 260−270
+4267%
|
6−7
−4267%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 120−130
+3933%
|
3−4
−3933%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 178
+2867%
|
6−7
−2867%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 150−160
+15100%
|
1−2
−15100%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 260−270
+4267%
|
6−7
−4267%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 120−130
+3933%
|
3−4
−3933%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 247
+8133%
|
3−4
−8133%
|
| Fortnite | 210−220
+5325%
|
4−5
−5325%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 190−200
+2313%
|
8−9
−2313%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 255
+12650%
|
2−3
−12650%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 141
+2250%
|
6−7
−2250%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+1833%
|
9−10
−1833%
|
| Valorant | 270−280
+709%
|
30−35
−709%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 150−160
+15100%
|
1−2
−15100%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 260−270
+4267%
|
6−7
−4267%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280
+827%
|
30−33
−827%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 120−130
+3933%
|
3−4
−3933%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 225
+7400%
|
3−4
−7400%
|
| Fortnite | 210−220
+5325%
|
4−5
−5325%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 190−200
+2313%
|
8−9
−2313%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 225
+11150%
|
2−3
−11150%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 180
+17900%
|
1−2
−17900%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 108
+1700%
|
6−7
−1700%
|
| Metro Exodus | 120−130
+6100%
|
2−3
−6100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+1833%
|
9−10
−1833%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 280
+3900%
|
7−8
−3900%
|
| Valorant | 270−280
+709%
|
30−35
−709%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 150−160
+15100%
|
1−2
−15100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 120−130
+3933%
|
3−4
−3933%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 212
+6967%
|
3−4
−6967%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 190−200
+2313%
|
8−9
−2313%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 81
+1250%
|
6−7
−1250%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+1833%
|
9−10
−1833%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 142
+1929%
|
7−8
−1929%
|
| Valorant | 270−280
+3829%
|
7−8
−3829%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 210−220
+5325%
|
4−5
−5325%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 130−140
+3350%
|
4−5
−3350%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 350−400
+4388%
|
8−9
−4388%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 131
+4267%
|
3−4
−4267%
|
| Metro Exodus | 75−80
+3800%
|
2−3
−3800%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+4275%
|
4−5
−4275%
|
| Valorant | 300−350
+6100%
|
5−6
−6100%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 120−130
+4000%
|
3−4
−4000%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 60−65
+6300%
|
1−2
−6300%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 144
+14300%
|
1−2
−14300%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 150−160
+5033%
|
3−4
−5033%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 58
+5700%
|
1−2
−5700%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 106
+5200%
|
2−3
−5200%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 130−140
+6800%
|
2−3
−6800%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 60−65
+6100%
|
1−2
−6100%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 124
+727%
|
14−16
−727%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 45−50
+4700%
|
1−2
−4700%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 89
+4350%
|
2−3
−4350%
|
| Valorant | 290−300
+4086%
|
7−8
−4086%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 80−85
+4050%
|
2−3
−4050%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 60−65
+6100%
|
1−2
−6100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−33 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 74
+7300%
|
1−2
−7300%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 100−110
+5250%
|
2−3
−5250%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 32 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 80−85
+4000%
|
2−3
−4000%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 70−75
+3500%
|
2−3
−3500%
|
This is how RTX 5060 and Radeon 820M compete in popular games:
- RTX 5060 is 3975% faster in 1080p
- RTX 5060 is 3850% faster in 1440p
- RTX 5060 is 5200% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 5060 is 17900% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, RTX 5060 surpassed Radeon 820M in all 45 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 46.91 | 1.22 |
| Recency | 19 May 2025 | 2 June 2024 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm |
RTX 5060 has a 3745.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 11 months.
Radeon 820M, on the other hand, has a 25% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce RTX 5060 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 820M in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce RTX 5060 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon 820M is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
