Radeon 880M vs Arc 8-Core iGPU

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc 8-Core iGPU and Radeon 880M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc 8-Core iGPU
2023
18.69

880M outperforms Arc 8-Core iGPU by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking293270
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data93.33
ArchitectureXe LPG (2023)RDNA 3.5 (2024)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUStrix Point
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)15 July 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8512
Core clock speedno data400 MHz
Boost clock speed2300 MHz2900 MHz
Number of transistorsno data34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data92.80
Floating-point processing powerno data2.97 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc 8-Core iGPU 18.69
Radeon 880M 20.14
+7.8%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Arc 8-Core iGPU 12321
Radeon 880M 14014
+13.7%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc 8-Core iGPU 8561
+1.2%
Radeon 880M 8463

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Arc 8-Core iGPU 43978
Radeon 880M 51662
+17.5%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Arc 8-Core iGPU 3266
+2.2%
Radeon 880M 3197

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
+2.9%
35
−2.9%
1440p19
+5.6%
18−21
−5.6%
4K14
+0%
14−16
+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−7.1%
45−50
+7.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−6.6%
65−70
+6.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+1800%
2−3
−1800%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−4.7%
45−50
+4.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−2.6%
120−130
+2.6%
Hitman 3 35−40
+800%
4−5
−800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+1038%
8−9
−1038%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−1.6%
65−70
+1.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+1425%
4−5
−1425%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+214%
27−30
−214%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+1300%
3−4
−1300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−6.6%
65−70
+6.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+1800%
2−3
−1800%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−4.7%
45−50
+4.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−2.6%
120−130
+2.6%
Hitman 3 35−40
+800%
4−5
−800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+1038%
8−9
−1038%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−1.6%
65−70
+1.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 58
+1350%
4−5
−1350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+367%
9−10
−367%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+214%
27−30
−214%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+1300%
3−4
−1300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+1800%
2−3
−1800%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−4.7%
45−50
+4.7%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−2.6%
120−130
+2.6%
Hitman 3 35−40
+800%
4−5
−800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 41
+413%
8−9
−413%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 46
+1050%
4−5
−1050%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
+167%
9−10
−167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−2.3%
90−95
+2.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+2%
100−105
−2%
Hitman 3 21−24
+267%
6−7
−267%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+1800%
2−3
−1800%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 34
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+0.9%
110−120
−0.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+1450%
2−3
−1450%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hitman 3 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
−4.2%
100−105
+4.2%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14
+0%
14−16
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%

This is how Arc 8-Core iGPU and Radeon 880M compete in popular games:

  • Arc 8-Core iGPU is 3% faster in 1080p
  • Arc 8-Core iGPU is 6% faster in 1440p
  • A tie in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Arc 8-Core iGPU is 1800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Arc 8-Core iGPU surpassed Radeon 880M in all 23 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.69 20.14
Recency 14 December 2023 15 July 2024
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm

Radeon 880M has a 7.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Arc 8-Core iGPU and Radeon 880M.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Arc 8-Core iGPU
AMD Radeon 880M
Radeon 880M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 16 votes

Rate Arc 8-Core iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 5 votes

Rate Radeon 880M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.