NVIDIA GeForce MX330: specs and benchmarks

VS

Summary

NVIDIA started GeForce MX330 sales 20 February 2020. This is a laptop graphics card based on a Pascal architecture and made with 14 nm manufacturing process. It is primarily aimed at gamers. 2 GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 7 GHz are supplied, and together with 64 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 48.06 GB/s.

Compatibility-wise, this is card attached via PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. Power consumption is at 25 Watt (12 - 25 Watt TGP).

It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at 6.33% of a leader's which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

RTX 4090GeForce RTX4090
Compare

General info

Some basic facts about GeForce MX330: architecture, market segment, release date etc.

Place in performance ranking541
Place by popularitynot in top-100
Value for money3.34
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameN17S-LP / N17S-G3
Market segmentLaptop
Release date20 February 2020 (4 years old)
Current price$1079 of 168889 (A100 PCIe 80 GB)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Technical specs

GeForce MX330's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of GeForce MX330's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384of 20480 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT)
Core clock speed1531 MHzof 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT)
Boost clock speed1594 MHzof 3599 (Radeon RX 7990 XTX)
Number of transistors1,800 millionof 14400 (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile)
Manufacturing process technology14 nmof 4 (GeForce RTX 4080)
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt (12 - 25 Watt TGP)of 2400 (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem)
Texture fill rate38.26of 969.9 (H100 SXM5 96 GB)

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce MX330's compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNone

Memory

Parameters of memory installed on GeForce MX330: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.

Memory typeGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GBof 192 (Radeon Instinct MI300X)
Memory bus width64 Bitof 19000 (GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB)
Memory clock speed7000 MHzof 23000 (GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER)
Memory bandwidth48.06 GB/sof 3276 (Aldebaran)
Shared memory-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on GeForce MX330. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs

Technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by GeForce MX330. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+

API support

APIs supported by GeForce MX330, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.4
OpenGL4.6
OpenCL1.2
Vulkan1.2.131
CUDA6.1

Benchmark performance

Synthetic benchmark performance of GeForce MX330. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX330 6.33

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GeForce MX330 2453

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GeForce MX330 4834

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GeForce MX330 3762

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GeForce MX330 20729

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GeForce MX330 10947

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

GeForce MX330 243721

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

GeForce MX330 10022

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GeForce MX330 9906

Gaming performance

Let's see how good GeForce MX330 is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

Full HD22
4K23

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−11

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 19
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9
Battlefield 5 29
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 23
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
Far Cry 5 23
Far Cry New Dawn 24
Forza Horizon 4 31
Hitman 3 19
Horizon Zero Dawn 13
Red Dead Redemption 2 15
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
Watch Dogs: Legion 14

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8
Battlefield 5 23
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
Far Cry 5 15
Far Cry New Dawn 15
Forza Horizon 4 22
Hitman 3 15
Horizon Zero Dawn 10
Metro Exodus 11
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
Watch Dogs: Legion 12

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
Battlefield 5 19
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
Far Cry 5 14
Far Cry New Dawn 14
Forza Horizon 4 16
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
Hitman 3 10−11
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
Metro Exodus 4−5
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
Battlefield 5 5−6
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
Far Cry 5 10−11
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
Hitman 3 6−7
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
Metro Exodus 1−2
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
Battlefield 5 2−3
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2

Relative perfomance

Overall GeForce MX330 performance compared to nearest competitors among notebook video cards.


AMD equivalent

According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to GeForce MX330 is Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), which is slower by 1% and lower by 3 positions in our ranking.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)Radeon RXVega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce MX330:

Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

GeForce MX250GeForceMX250
Compare
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)Radeon RXVega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Compare
RX 550X MobileRadeon RX550X Mobile
Compare
GeForce MX150GeForceMX150
Compare
RX 550 MobileRadeon RX550 Mobile
Compare
RX Vega 9Radeon RXVega 9
Compare

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with GeForce MX330 according to our statistics.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.


3.7 1996 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce MX330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about GeForce MX330, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.