Radeon Pro 5300 vs GeForce GTX 1650

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

GTX 1650
2019
4 GB GDDR5
20.33
+8.9%

GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon Pro 5300 by 9% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking253277
Place by popularity2not in top-100
Value for money19.048.45
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameTU117Navi 14
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date23 April 2019 (4 years old)4 August 2020 (3 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data
Current price$185 (1.2x MSRP)$1300
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1650 has 125% better value for money than Pro 5300.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8961280
Core clock speed1485 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1665 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate93.24132.0

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz14 GB/s
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA7.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 20.33
+8.9%
Pro 5300 18.66

GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon Pro 5300 by 9% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1650 7876
+9%
Pro 5300 7229

GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon Pro 5300 by 9% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70
+16.7%
60−65
−16.7%
1440p38
+26.7%
30−35
−26.7%
4K23
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 53
+17.8%
45−50
−17.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 47
+17.5%
40−45
−17.5%
Battlefield 5 61
+10.9%
55−60
−10.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 76
+16.9%
65−70
−16.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
Far Cry 5 68
+13.3%
60−65
−13.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 66
+10%
60−65
−10%
Forza Horizon 4 90
+12.5%
80−85
−12.5%
Hitman 3 76
+16.9%
65−70
−16.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55
+10%
50−55
−10%
Red Dead Redemption 2 52
+15.6%
45−50
−15.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 58
+16%
50−55
−16%
Watch Dogs: Legion 56
+12%
50−55
−12%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 47
+17.5%
40−45
−17.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Battlefield 5 53
+17.8%
45−50
−17.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 58
+16%
50−55
−16%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
Far Cry 5 62
+12.7%
55−60
−12.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 62
+12.7%
55−60
−12.7%
Forza Horizon 4 83
+10.7%
75−80
−10.7%
Hitman 3 62
+12.7%
55−60
−12.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 41
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Metro Exodus 35
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 28
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 47
+17.5%
40−45
−17.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
+13.8%
65−70
−13.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 48
+20%
40−45
−20%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 25
+19%
21−24
−19%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13
+30%
10−11
−30%
Battlefield 5 51
+13.3%
45−50
−13.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
Far Cry 5 58
+16%
50−55
−16%
Far Cry New Dawn 57
+14%
50−55
−14%
Forza Horizon 4 65
+18.2%
55−60
−18.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 42
+20%
35−40
−20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 36
+20%
30−33
−20%
Hitman 3 37
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 26
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Metro Exodus 20
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 17
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 29
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13
+30%
10−11
−30%
Battlefield 5 39
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Far Cry 5 39
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 41
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Forza Horizon 4 46
+15%
40−45
−15%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Hitman 3 19
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Metro Exodus 12
+20%
10−11
−20%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 13
+30%
10−11
−30%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 13
+30%
10−11
−30%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5
+25%
4−5
−25%
Battlefield 5 21
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 19
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 21
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 30
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

This is how GTX 1650 and Pro 5300 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • GTX 1650 is 16.7% faster than Pro 5300

1440p resolution:

  • GTX 1650 is 26.7% faster than Pro 5300

4K resolution:

  • GTX 1650 is 9.5% faster than Pro 5300

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 20.33 18.66
Recency 23 April 2019 4 August 2020
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 85 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon Pro 5300.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro 5300 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
AMD Radeon Pro 5300
Radeon Pro 5300

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 20461 vote

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 79 votes

Rate AMD Radeon Pro 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.