Radeon Pro 5300 vs GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated353
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data15.32
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameTU116Navi 14
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 July 2020 (5 years ago)4 August 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8961280
Core clock speed1410 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate89.04132.0
Floating-point processing power2.849 TFLOPS4.224 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs5680
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.21.2
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 85 Watt

GTX 1650 TU116 has 6.3% lower power consumption.

Pro 5300, on the other hand, has a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and Radeon Pro 5300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro 5300 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
AMD Radeon Pro 5300
Radeon Pro 5300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 101 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 100 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 or Radeon Pro 5300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.