Quadro P5000 vs GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile with Quadro P5000, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1080 Mobile
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
35.51
+8.3%

GTX 1080 Mobile outperforms P5000 by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking143170
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation43.417.24
Power efficiency16.2612.51
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGP104GP104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 August 2016 (8 years ago)1 October 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499.99 $2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GTX 1080 Mobile has 500% better value for money than Quadro P5000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602048
Core clock speed1607 MHz1607 MHz
Boost clock speed1771 MHz1733 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt100 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature94 °Cno data
Texture fill rate283.4277.3
Floating-point processing power9.068 TFLOPS8.873 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs160160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed10 GB/s1127 MHz
Memory bandwidth320 GB/s192 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support+no data
Display Portno data1.4
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no data
Optimus-+
3D Stereono data+
Mosaicno data+
VR Ready+no data
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+
Ansel+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA+6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD116
+24.7%
93
−24.7%
1440p73
+12.3%
65−70
−12.3%
4K56
+36.6%
41
−36.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.31
+523%
26.87
−523%
1440p6.85
+461%
38.45
−461%
4K8.93
+583%
60.95
−583%
  • GTX 1080 Mobile has 523% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1080 Mobile has 461% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1080 Mobile has 583% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 95−100
+10.2%
85−90
−10.2%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+10.8%
65−70
−10.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+8.7%
65−70
−8.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 95−100
+10.2%
85−90
−10.2%
Battlefield 5 115
+1.8%
110−120
−1.8%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+10.8%
65−70
−10.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+8.7%
65−70
−8.7%
Far Cry 5 91
−9.9%
100−105
+9.9%
Fortnite 143
+2.1%
140−150
−2.1%
Forza Horizon 4 108
−11.1%
120−130
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+9%
85−90
−9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+8.2%
120−130
−8.2%
Valorant 188
−2.7%
190−200
+2.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 95−100
+10.2%
85−90
−10.2%
Battlefield 5 112
−0.9%
110−120
+0.9%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+10.8%
65−70
−10.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0.7%
270−280
−0.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+8.7%
65−70
−8.7%
Dota 2 130−140
+2.2%
130−140
−2.2%
Far Cry 5 117
+17%
100−105
−17%
Fortnite 201
+43.6%
140−150
−43.6%
Forza Horizon 4 106
−13.2%
120−130
+13.2%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+9%
85−90
−9%
Grand Theft Auto V 119
+11.2%
100−110
−11.2%
Metro Exodus 73
+4.3%
70−75
−4.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 115
−6.1%
120−130
+6.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 142
+44.9%
98
−44.9%
Valorant 186
−3.8%
190−200
+3.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 102
−10.8%
110−120
+10.8%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+10.8%
65−70
−10.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+8.7%
65−70
−8.7%
Dota 2 120
−12.5%
130−140
+12.5%
Far Cry 5 108
+8%
100−105
−8%
Forza Horizon 4 102
−17.6%
120−130
+17.6%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+9%
85−90
−9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 91
−34.1%
120−130
+34.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
+39.6%
53
−39.6%
Valorant 137
−40.9%
190−200
+40.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150
+7.1%
140−150
−7.1%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+8.1%
210−220
−8.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+10.2%
55−60
−10.2%
Metro Exodus 44
+2.3%
40−45
−2.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 183
−25.7%
230−240
+25.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 86
+4.9%
80−85
−4.9%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+9.1%
30−35
−9.1%
Far Cry 5 74
+2.8%
70−75
−2.8%
Forza Horizon 4 87
+4.8%
80−85
−4.8%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+9.3%
50−55
−9.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+11.1%
50−55
−11.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 88
+14.3%
75−80
−14.3%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
+24.6%
60−65
−24.6%
Metro Exodus 27
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+41.7%
36
−41.7%
Valorant 178
−3.4%
180−190
+3.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 52
+8.3%
45−50
−8.3%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Dota 2 95−100
+5.3%
90−95
−5.3%
Far Cry 5 40
+5.3%
35−40
−5.3%
Forza Horizon 4 61
+10.9%
55−60
−10.9%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+12.9%
30−35
−12.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 33
−9.1%
35−40
+9.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 42
+16.7%
35−40
−16.7%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

This is how GTX 1080 Mobile and Quadro P5000 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 Mobile is 25% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1080 Mobile is 12% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1080 Mobile is 37% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1080 Mobile is 45% faster.
  • in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P5000 is 41% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 Mobile is ahead in 49 tests (73%)
  • Quadro P5000 is ahead in 15 tests (22%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.51 32.78
Recency 15 August 2016 1 October 2016
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 100 Watt

GTX 1080 Mobile has a 8.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Quadro P5000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 50% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile and Quadro P5000.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile is a notebook card while Quadro P5000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1080
NVIDIA Quadro P5000
Quadro P5000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 338 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 183 votes

Rate Quadro P5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile or Quadro P5000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.