GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile vs Quadro P5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P104-100 P104-101 Quadro P4000 Quadro P5000 Tesla P4 Tesla P6
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1050 Mobile GTX 1050 Max-Q GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P5000 with GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P5000
2016
16 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
32.47
+184%

P5000 outperforms GTX 1050 Mobile by a whopping 184% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
GTX 1050 Mobile GTX 1050

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking172426
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.20no data
Power efficiency12.5110.60
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGP104GP107B
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 October 2016 (8 years ago)3 January 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048640
Core clock speed1607 MHz1354 MHz
Boost clock speed1733 MHz1493 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt75 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data97 °C
Texture fill rate277.359.72
Floating-point processing power8.873 TFLOPS1.911 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs16040

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4000 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1127 MHz7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth192 GB/s112 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortDP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDCP-2.2
Display Port1.4no data
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream-+
GPU Boostno data3.0
Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data
Anselno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.1+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p200−210
+174%
73
−174%
Full HD93
+102%
46
−102%
1440p65−70
+171%
24
−171%
4K41
+173%
15
−173%

Cost per frame, $

1080p26.87no data
1440p38.45no data
4K60.95no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 85−90
+193%
30−33
−193%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+210%
21−24
−210%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+188%
24−27
−188%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 85−90
+193%
30−33
−193%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+122%
51
−122%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+210%
21−24
−210%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+188%
24−27
−188%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+154%
39
−154%
Fortnite 140−150
+6.1%
132
−6.1%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+116%
55
−116%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+197%
30−33
−197%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+165%
46
−165%
Valorant 190−200
+197%
65−70
−197%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 85−90
+193%
30−33
−193%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+157%
44
−157%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+210%
21−24
−210%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+73%
150−160
−73%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+188%
24−27
−188%
Dota 2 130−140
+7.1%
126
−7.1%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+175%
36
−175%
Fortnite 140−150
+175%
51
−175%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+129%
52
−129%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+197%
30−33
−197%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−110
+155%
42
−155%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+268%
19
−268%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+198%
41
−198%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 98
+151%
39
−151%
Valorant 190−200
+197%
65−70
−197%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+205%
37
−205%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+210%
21−24
−210%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+188%
24−27
−188%
Dota 2 130−140
+17.4%
115
−17.4%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+200%
33
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+222%
37
−222%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+197%
30−33
−197%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+321%
29
−321%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 53
+141%
22
−141%
Valorant 190−200
+197%
65−70
−197%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 140−150
+259%
39
−259%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+189%
9−10
−189%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+157%
80−85
−157%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+269%
16−18
−269%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+291%
11
−291%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+192%
60−65
−192%
Valorant 230−240
+188%
80−85
−188%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+215%
26
−215%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+230%
10−11
−230%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+243%
21
−243%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+219%
26
−219%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+200%
18−20
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+200%
18−20
−200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+208%
25
−208%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+177%
21−24
−177%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+286%
7
−286%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
+177%
12−14
−177%
Valorant 180−190
+207%
60−65
−207%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+269%
13
−269%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Dota 2 90−95
+176%
34
−176%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+236%
11
−236%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+267%
15
−267%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+210%
10−11
−210%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+200%
12
−200%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+260%
10
−260%

This is how Quadro P5000 and GTX 1050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P5000 is 174% faster in 900p
  • Quadro P5000 is 102% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P5000 is 171% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P5000 is 173% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P5000 is 321% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Quadro P5000 surpassed GTX 1050 Mobile in all 38 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 32.47 11.45
Recency 1 October 2016 3 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4000 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 75 Watt

Quadro P5000 has a 183.6% higher aggregate performance score, and a 309.6% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1050 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P5000 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P5000
Quadro P5000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
vs
Pro 5700 XT Radeon Pro 5700 XT
GTX 1050 Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
vs
Arc Graphics 130V Arc Graphics 130V
Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
vs
Pro VII Radeon Pro VII
HD 8180 AMD HD 8180
vs
Radeon 880M 880M
HD 6290 AMD HD 6290
vs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
HD 6290 AMD HD 6290
vs
RX Vega 2 Vega 2
HD 6290 AMD HD 6290
vs
Graphics Graphics
HD 6250 AMD HD 6250
vs
Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU 32-Core GPU
Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
vs
UHD Graphics Graphics
Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
vs
Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB PCIe 32 GB
Quadro P4000 Quadro P4000
vs
FX 3700M 3700M
Quadro P4000 Quadro P4000
vs
RX 470D 470D
Pro 460 AMD Pro 460
vs
Steam Deck 8CU Deck 8CU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 183 votes

Rate Quadro P5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 1322 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P5000 or GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.