GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile vs Quadro P5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P104-100 P104-101 Quadro P4000 Quadro P5000 Tesla P4 Tesla P6
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1050 Mobile GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q GTX 1050 Max-Q GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GTX 1060 Mobile GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB GTX 1070 Mobile GTX 1070 Max-Q GTX 1070 SLI Mobile GTX 1080 Mobile GTX 1080 Max-Q GTX 1080 SLI Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P5000 with GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P5000
2016
16 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
28.30
+66.8%

P5000 outperforms GTX 1060 Mobile by an impressive 67% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
GTX 1060 Mobile GTX 1060

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking172295
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.6926.55
Power efficiency12.4216.76
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGP104GP106
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 October 2016 (8 years ago)15 August 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 $237.11

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GTX 1060 Mobile has 297% better value for money than Quadro P5000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481280
Core clock speed1607 MHz1506 MHz
Boost clock speed1733 MHz1708 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt80 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data94 °C
Texture fill rate277.3133.6
Floating-point processing power8.873 TFLOPS4.275 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs16080

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1127 MHz2002 MHz
Memory bandwidth192 GB/s192 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortDP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDCP-2.2
Display Port1.4no data
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream-+
GPU Boostno data3.0
Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
VR Readyno data+
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data
Anselno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.1+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD93
+36.8%
68
−36.8%
1440p75−80
+66.7%
45
−66.7%
4K41
+36.7%
30
−36.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p26.87
−671%
3.49
+671%
1440p33.32
−532%
5.27
+532%
4K60.95
−671%
7.90
+671%
  • GTX 1060 Mobile has 671% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1060 Mobile has 532% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1060 Mobile has 671% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 85−90
+20.5%
73
−20.5%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+28.5%
137
−28.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+86.5%
37
−86.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 85−90
+72.5%
51
−72.5%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+18.8%
96
−18.8%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+60%
110
−60%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+130%
30
−130%
Far Cry 5 100−105
+33.3%
75
−33.3%
Fortnite 140−150
−26.4%
177
+26.4%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+17.6%
102
−17.6%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+40.6%
69
−40.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+56.4%
78
−56.4%
Valorant 190−200
+41.9%
136
−41.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 85−90
+175%
32
−175%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+40.7%
81
−40.7%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+141%
73
−141%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+23.4%
222
−23.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+176%
25
−176%
Dota 2 130−140
+27.4%
100−110
−27.4%
Far Cry 5 100−105
+47.1%
68
−47.1%
Fortnite 140−150
+33.3%
105
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+31.9%
91
−31.9%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+59%
61
−59%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−110
+44.6%
74
−44.6%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+75%
40
−75%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+82.1%
67
−82.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 98
+42%
69
−42%
Valorant 190−200
+44%
134
−44%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+60.6%
71
−60.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+200%
23
−200%
Dota 2 130−140
+14.4%
118
−14.4%
Far Cry 5 100−105
+56.3%
64
−56.3%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+69%
71
−69%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+135%
52
−135%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 53
+35.9%
39
−35.9%
Valorant 190−200
+168%
72
−168%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 140−150
+72.8%
81
−72.8%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+92.1%
35−40
−92.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+58.2%
130−140
−58.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+84.4%
30−35
−84.4%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+87%
23
−87%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+4.2%
160−170
−4.2%
Valorant 230−240
+72.9%
133
−72.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+54.7%
53
−54.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+94.1%
16−18
−94.1%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+67.4%
43
−67.4%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+45.6%
57
−45.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+77.4%
30−35
−77.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+54%
50
−54%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+60%
14−16
−60%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+113%
16−18
−113%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+79.4%
30−35
−79.4%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+92.9%
14
−92.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
+38.5%
26
−38.5%
Valorant 180−190
+57.3%
117
−57.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+71.4%
28
−71.4%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+113%
16−18
−113%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Dota 2 90−95
+46.9%
60−65
−46.9%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+81%
21
−81%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+57.1%
35
−57.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+112%
17
−112%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+56.5%
23
−56.5%

This is how Quadro P5000 and GTX 1060 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P5000 is 37% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P5000 is 67% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P5000 is 37% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P5000 is 200% faster.
  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1060 Mobile is 26% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P5000 is ahead in 62 tests (98%)
  • GTX 1060 Mobile is ahead in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 28.30 16.97
Recency 1 October 2016 15 August 2016
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 6 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 80 Watt

Quadro P5000 has a 66.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, and a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1060 Mobile, on the other hand, has 25% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P5000 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P5000
Quadro P5000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1060
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
vs
Pro 5700 XT Radeon Pro 5700 XT
GTX 1060 Mobile GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
vs
RX 6500M Radeon RX 6500M
Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
vs
Pro VII Radeon Pro VII
GMA 3150 GMA 3150
vs
HD 6290 HD 6290
HD 6290 Radeon HD 6290
vs
HD 6250 HD 6250
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150
vs
HD 6250 HD 6250
GTX 750 v2 GeForce GTX 750 v2
vs
HD 6250 HD 6250
GTX 1070 Mobile GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
vs
Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
GTX 980M GeForce GTX 980M
vs
Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
M5000M Quadro M5000M
vs
Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
M4000M Quadro M4000M
vs
Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
M3000M Quadro M3000M
vs
Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
K5100M Quadro K5100M
vs
Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 183 votes

Rate Quadro P5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 601 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P5000 or GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.